We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month. The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality and insightfulness of their content.
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month. We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Content Contributor
Eligible to Earn
Most Viewed in a Space
Monthly Prize Winner
Mini-Competition/Flash Contest Winner
Essay Competition Winner
Spoken Word Competition Winner
Hundred Insight Club (HIC) (100+ Insights)
Contributor (500+ Score)
Top Contributor (2000+ Score)
Elite Contributor (5000+ Score)
Trusted Contributor
2 Replies
Yes I get the environment and up-bringing factor in all of it.
In that regard, definitely, there should always be room, lots of grace given for the person to learn, without unnecessary criticism and all the "and ee no even sweet".
Oh, so for the cooking thing, I was more focused on the learning aspect. It can't hurt to learn how to whip up something. Of course I don't support the idea of not wanting to do it but the fact that there is an abandonment. No leeway is given, especially if that person grew up in an environment that did not need them in the kitchen, especially the obscenely affluent echelon. Or maybe since you have this skill, you could teach that person. The superiority complex of it all just irks me