We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month. The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality and insightfulness of their content.
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month. We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Content Contributor
Eligible to Earn
Most Viewed in a Space
Monthly Prize Winner
Mini-Competition/Flash Contest Winner
Essay Competition Winner
Spoken Word Competition Winner
Hundred Insight Club (HIC) (100+ Insights)
Contributor (500+ Score)
Top Contributor (2000+ Score)
Elite Contributor (5000+ Score)
Trusted Contributor
1 Reply
There's a need to not get bugged down by generalisations. This is a simple tool of language. For the women (and men) that advocate for a chance or danger with the bear, this is a choice for a kind of death or danger that potentially keeps one's humanity in tact. It could be a tsunami, plague or any other force of nature; one argument for this is, men have proven so dangerous and dehumanising in their methods, that I would take my chances with the beast that clearly bares its teeth