We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month. The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality and insightfulness of their content.
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month. We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Content Contributor
Eligible to Earn
Most Viewed in a Space
Monthly Prize Winner
Mini-Competition/Flash Contest Winner
Essay Competition Winner
Spoken Word Competition Winner
Hundred Insight Club (HIC) (100+ Insights)
Contributor (500+ Score)
Top Contributor (2000+ Score)
Elite Contributor (5000+ Score)
Trusted Contributor
3 Replies
You are welcome 🙃.
I love how you took out your time to point out cases where men treated women badly, and I do not support I'll treatments towards women at all 🙃
Honestly these insight does not apply to all men .😊
Please check out my new insight, I feel you may like it. It's titled "Sponge 🧽"
When it is time to talk about women who kill, we will do that. But for now, this is about men and their ill treatments towards women.
Thank you for your contribution.
Doubra I get where you are trying to come from. This is not a generalization. The good men know this, and know it is not affiliated to them. But how do we begin to pick the good ones out of the bad. And don't tell me I should use "bad men".
Secondly when we begin to make exceptions to every general rule or exceptions to every conversation, we cannot arrive at a logical conclusion.