We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month. The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality and insightfulness of their content.
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month. We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Content Contributor
Eligible to Earn
Most Viewed in a Space
Monthly Prize Winner
Mini-Competition/Flash Contest Winner
Essay Competition Winner
Spoken Word Competition Winner
Hundred Insight Club (HIC) (100+ Insights)
Contributor (500+ Score)
Top Contributor (2000+ Score)
Elite Contributor (5000+ Score)
Trusted Contributor
2 Replies
It’s like the notion that when something you had in abundance starts getting depleted, you sort of start valuing it more; and I believe human content will experience that in a substantial way.
In the end, given the almost inevitable future of ‘An AI agent per person’ , 100% human content will eventually have nothing but antique value.
Until then all we can, and should do is leverage these tools to become super productive and honestly, not worry at all about all the negatives.
I have sort of a different take on this as regards risks and challenges.
While there may be lots of things to worry about, I think one good outcome of having more and more AI-generated content is that it will put a premium on authentic, human-generated content. In other words, human content will become more and more valuable and appreciated.
Of course the challenge might be finding or filtering out said human content, but I’m almost certain that that premium will exist.