<p>There was going to be pre-coronation rite for the new leader. The only issue was that the king hadn't been chosen. However, since the council had established the necessary requirements, it wouldn't be a big deal. The rite takes place as soon as the monarch is chosen. No place for "brown envelope" politics or manipulation.
</p><p><br/></p><p>Although the king was expected to at least know God and be known by Him, the government was more civil than spiritual. Oh, the current monarch was rejected by God, not dead or deposed. He was the first monarch to govern this great country with such a rich history. His tenure began well, but he soon fell out for several reasons, including being more focused on pleasing the people than his creator. Yes, it should be a good thing when a leader tries to please his people, but these ones can't tell right from wrong. To put it plainly, they were difficult to lead and would get anyone into trouble—and still deny it.</p><p><br/></p><p>The rite was going to be low-key because the current king didn’t have a clue about it. In fact, the incoming leader wasn't going to assume office until the incumbent dies. The council leader was on ground to choose the new king on the agreed date. The role of the council leader was a highly spiritual one; you need to be in tune with God to be able to make the right decision on behalf of the nation. You must also have a credible track record to be conferred with such authority. Asides from the spirituality, he was a man of integrity and tremendous respect, so you can be sure that whoever he selects is the right person.
</p><p><br/></p><p>God had led him to the abode of the next king and everything was ready for the consecration process. “This one looks like the king from all indication”, said the council leader to himself. He was spiritual from his physical appearance. An irony if you ask me. I won’t attempt to describe how a spiritual person looks judging from appearance alone. Feel free to take up that role and do the imagination yourself. If you need a reference, I’ll gladly provide you with one; the SU brother (or sister) in the university back then. Apologies if you’re a Gen Z. Did he really base his decisions on height and looks alone? Which requirements did the council agree on initially? Why did he flip the scripts suddenly?
</p><p><br/></p><p>At such a critical juncture, the council leader was going to make a fatal mistake. Everyone expected that since he had been walking closely with God for a long time, he should understand what it means to be spiritual. If he doesn’t, who will? Think of what might have happened if he had selected the wrong person to lead the country. The leader was probably used to a particular pattern, but this new king won’t be anything like that. While he must have thought that he knew God completely and could easily predict Him, he didn’t know he was in for a cruel shock. No, he wasn’t a false or incompetent leader. He just didn’t understand that God cannot be boxed - no matter how hard you try.
</p><p><br/></p><p>Indeed, we have evaluated people's spirituality based on their outward looks. We take great delight in being the barometers of spirituality, yet we have no idea what we're measuring. If the perceived spirituality doesn't align with our cultural upbringing, we will fight it with our very existence. We criticize and attack anything we do not understand. We will not accept anything that does not resemble the Christianity that was taught in our Sunday classes. The same is true for songs and movies. Everything must be done in the same old pattern we’re used to. Our prejudices and biases make us faith blind. We must all worship and give thanks to God in the same manner, regardless of the generation. We must be zombies, indeed! While we are busy criticizing others, God does not even view things the way we do. Before you condemn, take another ‘gaise’ at that artiste or individual, but this time see him or her through Jesus’ lenses.
</p><p><br/></p><p>Article is culled from the bible,1 Samuel 16:1-13.
</p><p><br/></p><p>
</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments