<p>Last time we played SMTP sorcery to conjure passwordless login—beautiful in theory, hell in practice. Every mail provider now demands a paid, registered domain; slip through, and your welcome email lands in Spam. So I ripped off the bandaid: back to email + password. Crazy? Absolutely. But the mission’s unchanged.</p><p>That's not even the worst part! The worst part is the abyss yawning beneath my screen—endless tweets mocking my data-starved soul as Nigeria’s telcos jack prices sky-high. ₦1,000 for 3.5 GB in 48 hours; what a fucking joke. I recharge, only to find my motivation drained faster than my balance. I wake up each morning to a blinking cursor and no muse to feed it.</p><p>And yet, in the darkest scrolls of my social media feed—amid memes, political outrage, and endless hot takes—something shifted. Suddenly, instead of doom-scroll despair, I saw builders building, live-streams of code shipping, threads on design patterns igniting impassioned debates. Iron sharpens iron, right? So I leaned in, slapped open my laptop, and felt that spark again: the urge to craft, to ship, to carve meaning out of code.</p><p>Wait! Before we even continue, what the heck is he building that he needs smtp magic, a domain or an auth <a class="tc-blue" href="https://flow.Before" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">flow.Before ↗</a> we dive into what I’m building—and how it’s helping me stare down every distraction, from data-hike rage to unrelenting self-doubt—let me confess: this project is as much therapy as it is product. Each feature is a rampart against the noise. Every line of TypeScript is a foothold.</p><p>Remember that beauty-and-the-beast SMTP setup? It lived in a table called magic_links, with columns for user_id, token, and expires_at. Pretty—until it wasn’t. So I</p><p>dropped the old table. Removed migrations</p><p>Tossed every smtp-related file, code and folder out of my codebase .</p><p>Committed the void—felt like pulling off a Band-Aid.</p><p>This moment hurt, but databases are like relationships: if the foundation’s rotten, you rebuild.</p><p>I have to scaffold a new auth structure for our good ol' email and password authentication, install required dependencies like bcrypt, scaffold new DB structure.</p><p><br/></p><p> I know I need a signup endpoint, but I don’t want just any signup endpoint—I want one that feels inevitable, like the internet needed me to write it.</p><p><br/></p><p>“So,” I murmur to myself, voice echoing off empty walls, “first off: what’s the bare minimum here? I need someone’s email and password. Of course I need to hash that password—plain text is for amateur hour.” I crack my knuckles and think, *bcrypt*, because that library’s been in my head since I first learned what ‘salt rounds’ were. Twelve rounds feels like the sweet spot—enough friction to keep attackers honest, but not so slow that I’m sobbing into my beer.</p><p><br/></p><p>I picture the user hitting “Submit” on that signup form. “POST,” I tell the code in my head, “that’s your signal. You listen for requests, you parse out JSON, and you validate: no empty email, no blank password. We’re not babysitting clowns who forgot to fill out a field.” It’s almost musical—JSON in, validation, then hashing. Each step is a note in the riff.</p><p><br/></p><p>And of course, I imagine a little Prisma client humming in the background: “I take that hashed password, I store it alongside your email, and I give you back a shiny `userId`.” I lean back, hiccup. “That’s it. That’s all we need.” I can see the flow in my mind like a conveyor belt in a Tesla factory—streamlined, elegant, unavoidable.</p><p><br/></p><p>I laugh to myself, thinking how this could’ve taken me days when I started, but now it’s muscle memory. The real genius isn’t in the code itself—it’s in stripping away every extra line, every unnecessary abstraction, until signup is pure. And that’s when I swivel in my chair, take another swig of beer, and whisper, “Ship it.”</p><p>Life’s a combustible mix of rage, hope, and code. We’ve faced the abyss—data hikes, unrelenting algorithms, self-doubt—and fought back with feature flags and clean code. This project isn’t just another SaaS; it’s my way of proving that even when the world screams “disconnect,” we can build something that connects</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments