Clarifying the Concepts of Peacemaking, Peacekeeping, and Peacebuilding
<p>For some time, I have been at the center of ambiguity about the differences between some major terms and key pillars used in diplomacy particularly in conflict resolution and international relations. These include peacekeeping, peacemaking, and peacebuilding.</p><p><br/></p><p>However, after attending a class on Defence and Strategic Studies where the lecturer spotlighted and gave lucid explanations about these concepts, I finally understood and developed a deeper appreciation of their differences and the areas where each one operates.</p><p><br/></p><p>To start with, peacemaking is the process of putting an active end to a conflict and reaching a peace agreement between quarreling parties. It usually takes place during ongoing conflict, even before a ceasefire, through negotiation, mediation, or diplomatic pressure. It is a situation where the two conflicting parties and sometimes diplomats from other nations not involved in the conflict sit at a round table to make peace and resolve the crisis.</p><p><br/></p><p>Peacekeeping, on the other hand, often involves the deployment of international personnel to conflict zones after a ceasefire to help maintain peace. It occurs when two parties suspend hostilities, and there is a need to prevent the conflict from restarting. Peacekeepers do not take sides, and peacekeeping missions are usually carried out by the United Nations (UN).</p><p><br/></p><p>Peacebuilding, as its name implies, has to do with long-term efforts to provide sustainable resolution. Just like physical building which requires laying a foundation, arranging blocks, roofing, and finishing—peacebuilding is a slow, deliberate process. It focuses on addressing the root causes of conflict and ensuring that such conflict does not reoccur. Although it takes time buy it creates a lasting and sustainable peace.</p><p><br/></p><p>Don’t stop moving.</p><p>Keep learning every day.</p><p>Keep growing.</p><p><br/></p><p>Do you have any additional thoughts on this?</p><p>Let me know in the comments.</p><p><br/></p>
At the end of each month, we give out cash prizes to 5 people with the best insights in the past month
as well as coupon points to 15 people who didn't make the top 5, but shared high-quality content.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments