<p>It seems every day in this beautiful country of mine, the bar gets to a new all-time low, and incompetence takes a step forward, even when you'd think there was no more land to claim.</p><p><br/></p><p>The latest being GMOs, which by the way have been in the works for years now. It's just the implementation phase that's brought our awareness to it. </p><p><br/></p><p>I won't go into the meaning as I am not a scientist, and Twitter already has so much on that. I am going to speak on the issue from a different perspective.</p><p><br/></p><p>The best way to sum this up is to see a 6-foot handsome man saying to himself, "No, I need more height." Or a beautiful perfectly endowed lady saying "BBL is still needed." To add more spice to this visualisation, there is the off-chance that this procedure could drastically negatively affect their lives. A true case of "Trouble dey sleep, yanga go wake am."</p><p><br/></p><p>Nigeria and Africa as a whole have one of the most fertile lands, which they export raw produce, including cash crops and natural resources. All these are then processed and sold, you get the cycle.</p><p><br/></p><p>Now, bear in mind that some of those cash crops aren't being sold for cash, they could be in exchange for debt. They could say.... "Give us crude and so and so crops," what this does is to incentivise more cash crops than planting for food, which creates hunger, and creates the loop of borrowing. </p><p>Even if that wasn't the case, you'd find more people making the smart play of exporting for foreign currency.</p><p>So, someone please explain to me why people are logically considering a system where a poor nation, in debt, plans to purchase seeds that the currency for transaction is pummeling our local currency in exchange markets, seeds that you legit see on view once, you plant and can't replant, so you just keep buying them. </p><p><br/></p><p>Even if they say they want to give us for free, wisdom and discernment should let us know that <strong>"Nothing is free, and we will pay for it some way." </strong></p><p>Still, because of the lack of values and monetisation of everything, people are willing to jump into deals without looking at the fine print.</p><p><br/></p><p>Now don't get me wrong, I've found that it is used in some countries like China to grow plants like cotton for textiles, which is brilliant, investing money to make money.</p><p><br/></p><p>Some say the idea is that it will help solve hunger, my reply to that is, what caused the hunger? There are farmers unable to go to their lands because of insecurity. The story of Sunday and his self-defence when he was attacked by a herdsman, which ended in him facing actual prosecution for defending himself, has been a topic for a while.</p><p><br/></p><p>Another question I'd ask is, would a plant that has the chance of making that farmland unable to grow normal crops for a while if you decide that you don't want GMOs any more, be a better solution to solve hunger?</p><p><br/></p><p>It's a really sad joke, because why should a sovereign nation trust another nation to feed its citizens? We have become so used to everyone but those in office doing the needful that we are even entertaining the idea.</p><p><br/></p><p>To quote an old post, the devil is in the details. If I give you all you say you want and make you reliant on me, you have no say or power later on. I can simply withhold what you have come to rely on. </p><p>A country in debt and at the mercy of another when it comes to feeding is unable to stand up for itself. </p><p><br/></p><p>Technology is meant to make lives better and easier. Before we embrace certain advances, we need to ask the necessary questions. </p><p><br/></p><p>Through history, we've been made to feel our natural God given gifts are inferior, then we trade them to get the "superior" foreign products which are made from the natural products we look down on and sell off for cheap. This is the sad reality of mental slavery, we do not know who we are, and because of that, we believe what we are told we are. We also do not realise and value the things we have.</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments