<p>For every given situation/problem there exists a single TRUTH. </p><p>The whole point of learning is to move closer to that truth. We usually begin with a conjecture (a guess) and then we examine and experiment with it until we can see whether it holds. The path to truth is really a process of willful error correction. A critical rationalist starts with a question, forms a conjecture, then puts it under scrutiny. The conjecture that comes closest to truth is the one that is hard to vary, the one that stays true across contexts, and once you realize it, you cannot unsee it no matter how much you try.</p><p>You cannot move toward truth if you carry rigid notions, dogmas, or ideologies. yet this is how most people think. they begin with a rigid belief and then try to make everything else fit within it. in doing so, they miss reality itself. Even the most educated professors can be wrong when their thinking is built on bad epistemology.</p><p>Critical rationalism is powerful because it asks you to start with nothing fixed. no beliefs, no dogmas, no ideology. You make a conjecture, you examine it carefully with the willingness to accept being initially wrong , so you never hold onto ideas too tightly. In this way, mistakes are highly welcomed, because mistakes point away from what is false and therefore closer to what is true.<br/></p><p>But this is extremely hard for most people, because we are evolutionary wired to believe. to think clearly without rigid priors takes practice, and it can be trained. If you truly value truth, you will come to see uncertainty not as a weakness, but as an essential part of the journey.<br/></p><p>And truth applies everywhere. Not only in science, but in art, in personal development, in how you live your everyday life. To invent a drug, to lead, to overcome depression, to find your path or to make great art all involve some form of truth seeking. In this process you must welcome uncertainty and to allow mistakes to guide you is to let truth, rather than dogma, shape your path.<br/></p>
At the end of each month, we give out cash prizes to 5 people with the best insights in the past month
as well as coupon points to 15 people who didn't make the top 5, but shared high-quality content.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments