How I developed a personality test Obsession; why I won't fix it.
It's getting obsessive. I would say I'm going to only some lengths to do a new test or discuss it further. Still, I am thoroughly captivated by tests and exercises that I can do and get feedback on some portion of who I might be.
The first type of personality test or literature I encountered was a book about four temperaments and how they blended into each individual uniquely. I know now there is a difference between temperament and personality. Still, I took it as sacred knowledge at the time - I was hooked. I ran with it all the way. I investigated my entire family and then my friends individually - no one was safe from my probes. The appeal of these tests and studies was simple; I could take shortcuts to find out who exactly I was - who doesn't want to know that? I could also do this for many people in my immediate circles. I took it upon myself to learn just why each person about me might be acting strangely, adequately, or for the sake of it; I just wondered why they were the way they were.
So my first personality test wasn't a personality test; that would come later. Along the way, I might have done one or two I forgot - might have even taken zodiac signs seriously for an afternoon there - but eventually, the Myer Briggs 16 personality test rocked my world. It felt like someone who had been spying on my every desire came through and slammed answers right in my face. "here you are, in the fine print. Your exact person codified in detail like never before", they would have said. I took that lengthy test with many expectations, which did not disappoint. "Architect", it said.
The test declared I was an INTJ, a turbulent one, and this was one of the essential pieces of information I could get on the internet at the time. You see, many people don't care about things like this. I was puzzled when I found this out a lot later. Still, this summation of my person was like a sit-down with the counselor telling me I was exactly where I needed to be. INTJ meant I was an introvert; I was pretty intuitive, spending time deciding on what things might be, and I was more in touch with my thoughts than my emotions. The J part says I judge or make more fixed decisions about things rather than letting them be. The site offered me summaries and shared findings about people with this particular arrangement of traits. That last part is where it became different for me.
Before this test and all its detail, I mainly wanted to know who I was for the sake of self-actualisation or clarity (at least in an explicit sense), but now, this test was a very rough map. I could understand in a vague sense why I didn't like certain groups of people, why all the friends closest to me were logicians (INTP ), Debaters (ENTP) or other members of a section described as analysts. I held on to the test result quite loosely till I finished my second degree and had another go. This time I was an Advocate. INFJ. I found this just as fascinating because I realised what I must have known intuitively; personalities can be fluid, especially with traits closer to median values.
So my map moved from INTJ to INFJ. All the fictional, historical and contemporary characters I had earmarked as references had to change slightly. I stayed INFJ for two years till I came across more credible studies on personality. I took a course recently delivered by Jordan B Peterson on what was defined as the Big Five personality traits. In each of us, to measure, the traits of Openness, Extroversion, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Agreeableness exist in bespoke levels of intensity. The combinations are infinite. It gets even more detailed. Openness is broken into openness to experience and intellect; extroversion into enthusiasm and assertiveness; conscientiousness splits into orderliness and industriousness; neuroticism into volatility and withdrawal; agreeableness is divided into compassion and politeness. I would share all the intricacies of the test or my particular results if it were manageable. The depth, however, drew me to this specific personality test.
Furthermore, the research favours the choice. Most scholarly articles on personality assessments cite the big five more than any other testing version. So far, I've established my obsession and shared details of two of the most telling versions of my person. However, I have yet to tell you why - The benefits that keep me engaged with this obsession.
I'll wrap up here. Say you're on the edge of a vast forest - unknowable to you. In this forest, dark and ancient, there are predators guarding treasures. There is nourishment, of course, because this is the way with forests. When you leave this forest on the other side, you will have completed a quest with the utmost satisfaction, ready to take on the next quest in your wake. A guide is the best thing you can get before going through such a place.
The next best thing is tools with particular uses. You might look to your side and see a fellow traveller with a shovel while you have a knife. He'll have advantages with that shovel; your knife will do you some specific good. Approaching these sorts of forests is how we tackle different portions of our world. Each respect is an unknowable forest. You approach your job selection, relationships, and self-fulfillment like great unknowns because they manifest themselves this way. In this analogy, that knife versus that fellow traveller's shovel? Those are your bespoke personality traits; they come with a rough map through these obstacles, and I strongly believe in knowing what I'm working with when I stand against predators that may be. Know what you're working with on the edge of life's forests.
When I wonder what job to take or why there's social anxiety, I remember this is normal; I'm high in openness, so I look to be creative; I'm not very agreeable, and my social batteries will give out too quickly because I'm pretty introverted. Among other things like IQ and factors beyond my control, I stick to this slight obsession because it's a low-resolution map of the universe I inhabit.
How I developed a personality test Obsession; w...
ByJoshua Omoijiade•5 plays
0:00 /
0:00
|
Thank you for your time! if you enjoyed reading this and would like to help me create more, please leave a tip and share - no amount is unwelcome 😊
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments