Living Through Fantasies: The Fall of Kamen in Scavengers Reign
<p>Scavengers Reign is, for me, a breathtaking fantastical experience. The effort dedicated to building the world of planet Vesta inhabited by the stranded passengers is worth all the praise I can give. I was particularly moved by the creative adaptations each creature possessed; it felt very much balanced between supernatural and something that just felt possible. I could imagine abilities like telekinesis and techno-organic life working largely because of the rich biomes of fantasy around it. This is, however, not a brief commentary on the world-building of Scavengers Reign, it is a short commentary on fantasies.
</p><p><img src="/media/inline_insight_image/download (5).jpg" alt=""></p><p><br></p><p>There’s a character named Kamen in the first season. We find out by the end of the season that he is responsible for their crash on the planet and he is by all accounts a man in a lot of pain - broken if you will. He tries to escape his escape pod trapped high up in a tree and is confronted by a psychic creature. This beast called a hollow, is a smallish quadrupedal that resembles a malformed panda crossed with a frog. It feeds smaller creatures with a bile-like fluid that emerges from its mouth and entrances them briefly. These creatures then gather or pluck fruits and feed them to the hollow, then it is on its way.</p><p><img src="/media/inline_insight_image/Hollow.jpg" alt=""></p><p><br></p><p>The paths of Kamen and the creature cross paths and after it essentially rescues him from his escape pod, he is fed this same bile and then we see the magic at play. While Kamen is meant to be helping his puppeteer to find nourishment, he appears on the outside to be a zombie-like person; eyes blackened as he tries within his human efforts to hunt game and acquire fruits in this alien world. On the inside of his mind, however, Kamen is living in reshaped memories. All that occurs in his mind is pleasurable and filled with only good thoughts from his time with his girlfriend back on Earth and even in the crashed spaceship. Eventually, he develops a ruthless streak of hunting larger and larger creatures for his benefactor - the herbivore turned voracious meat eater. He gives him increasingly larger game (even creatures from the same species as the mind controller) and the symbiote gives him fun pleasurable memories in return.</p><p><img src="/media/inline_insight_image/scavengers reign (5).jpg" alt=""></p><p><br></p><p>Kamen is aware that he is now dependent on these fantasies and memories. He sees no moral wrong in fattening this now monstrous creature at all costs; even when he runs into another marooned passenger, human life is not off limits. In this vein, the life Kamen returns to when under the spell of the creature becomes his real life. He operates in the real plain of existence but only via the realm of his fantasies. Here is my interpretation of this phenomenon especially as I believe it relates to us living on planet Earth. We are all much like Kamen; let us assume the beast, now fattened to monstrous proportions, is a hidden malevolence that we have the potential to develop. However, more crucially we all access our real lives via fantasies.</p><p><img src="/media/inline_insight_image/KAMEN.jpg" alt=""></p><p><br></p><p>In the view of famous philosopher, Slavoj Zizek, our various fantasies are deeply internalised world views even extending to ideologies we are unconscious of. These are not simple daydreams but influences on the way we think of the world around us. We are all in this view, interacting with every single thing in the real world through these fantasies. One example might be the ideal image held in mind of a perfect relationship or the organisation of the world according to one economic system or the other; a fantasy might be Deep fears or romantically dressed versions of activities such as sex or companionship. In Scavengers reign, Kamen is very vividly doing this - living in a mechanic state via his puppeteering fantasies but for us, the workings are more subtle. In a sense, we never really interact with the world as it truly might be (or is) we always funnel our lived experience through the invisible fantasies that drive us. When we strip away all subjective perceptions and fantasies dressing up our worlds, what we are left with in any instant case is what Zizek describes as the real. For example, one might imagine their or someone else’s death to be a deep poetic event filled with much heroic merit; something to be adored and honoured for years to come. In Reality, it might hold little or no significance; it really could be the empty extinguishing of life like with much any other organism. Here the fantasy serves as protection.
</p><p><img src="/media/inline_insight_image/Fantastical.jpg" alt=""></p><p><br></p><p>Finally, this is not a brief attack on fantasies. The point is not to put an end to accessing the real through fantasies; there is no inherent evil in this. An awareness of this, however, might help us remember the non-absolute nature of things and how we still have work to do in discerning morality. We cannot let an escape from discomfort or pain through fantasies shape us and inner malevolence into hulking beasts that threaten whatever reality it is that we try to access.
</p><p><img src="/media/inline_insight_image/scavengers-reign-animated-tv-series-32-1475x830.jpg" alt=""></p><p>
</p><p>
</p><p>
</p><p>
</p><p>
</p><p>
</p><p>
</p>
Living Through Fantasies: The Fall of Kamen in ...
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments