<p>He was from Mars and I was from Venus.</p><p>That is the kindest way I can explain it without using names or faces.</p><p>At first, I thought the distance was interesting. I told myself difference was depth, that unfamiliarity was something to be studied, not feared. I approached Mars the way women are taught to approach men — with patience, curiosity, and the quiet assumption that if we just understood them well enough, they would soften.</p><p>Mars never softened.</p><p>I watched him closely, the way you watch something you don’t trust but want to. I tried to learn his climate, his logic, the violence of his terrain. I excused the dust storms, called them temperament. I excused the barrenness, called it emotional restraint. I excused the hostility, called it strength. Every red flag was renamed something noble so I could keep standing there without admitting I was slowly suffocating.</p><p>Understanding him did not make him better.</p><p>It made him clearer.</p><p>Mars does not nurture. It conquers. It does not communicate; it dominates. Everything is a battlefield — feelings, conversations, love itself. Tenderness is treated like a weakness to be eradicated, not a language to be learned. And the most exhausting part is that Mars is not unaware of this. It simply does not care.</p><p>The distance between us was not emotional.</p><p>It was ideological.</p><p>Mars views sex the way empires view land. Acquisition is proof of worth. A high body count turns him into something impressive, something admired, something congratulated. The same numbers on a woman turn her into a warning label. Used. Careless. A disgrace. Mars never questions the arithmetic — only who is allowed to benefit from it.</p><p>He insists this is natural.</p><p>He insists it is not that deep.</p><p>Mars believes his desire is neutral, authoritative, entitled to space. When a woman alters her body for her own comfort — reducing pain, reclaiming autonomy — Mars feels comfortable announcing his disappointment. He mourns breasts he never carried, never suffered under, never owned. As though his preference should outweigh her spine, her breathing, her daily relief.</p><p>He does not see this as arrogance.</p><p>He calls it honesty.</p><p>Mars walks through the world unaware of the fear stitched into women’s routines. A woman walking home at night calculates exits, keys between fingers, footsteps behind her. Mars sees the same woman and thinks vulnerability is an invitation. He strikes up a conversation while she measures the distance between safety and disaster. He is offended when she is cold. He is confused when she is afraid.</p><p>He insists he meant no harm.</p><p>Mars does not experience his presence as a threat, so he assumes it is not one. He does not understand that fear does not require intent. That safety is not something women feel around men by default. That existing in a female body is a constant negotiation with male unpredictability.</p><p>A woman can have a terrible day — bruised by labor, disrespected by systems, exhausted by survival — and still Mars will feel entitled to her appearance. He will interrupt her grief to remind her she would be prettier if she smiled. As if her face exists for his comfort. As if her exhaustion is an inconvenience to his pleasure.</p><p>Mars does not see this as cruelty.</p><p>He calls it a compliment.</p><p>And that is the problem. Not that Mars is violent — though he can be — but that his worldview centers him so completely that women become background objects. Bodies to desire. Faces to decorate his day. Numbers to tally. Threats to dismiss. Discomforts to minimize.</p><p>I grew angry not because he was different, but because I kept being expected to adapt to his difference. To become fluent in emotional neglect. To accept silence as depth. To interpret cruelty as honesty. To praise detachment as maturity.</p><p>I began to hate him.</p><p>Not dramatically. Not loudly. But in the quiet, corrosive way hatred forms when disappointment is repeatedly dismissed. I wanted him to be gentle. To be intentional. To be safe. I wanted him to be something he fundamentally was not.</p><p>And that is when it became obvious.</p><p>The things I kept begging Mars for were not rare. They were not unreasonable. They existed naturally elsewhere. I did not need to reshape an entire planet to experience them.</p><p>Earth exists. Briefly. Barely worth mentioning.</p><p>Because this story is not about where life thrives.</p><p>It is about where it does not.</p><p>This is not the personification of planets.</p><p>It is the objectification of humans.</p><p>Mars is men whose comfort is protected, whose desire is centered, whose harm is minimized. Venus is women taught to overextend, over-explain, overstay. Taught that love is labor and patience is proof of virtue.</p><p>We are taught to study Mars instead of asking why it is so uninhabitable.</p><p>So no, this is not a tragic love story.</p><p>It is a case study in misplaced endurance.</p><p>In women confusing understanding with obligation.</p><p>In mistaking survival for connection.</p><p>Mars is not misunderstood.</p><p>Mars is not unfinished.</p><p>Mars is simply not a home</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments