"More Than What Meets the Eyes — inspired by the woman in this photo."
<h2>Beyond Pity: How a Blog Post Reshaped My View of Prosthetics and Human Potential </h2><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">A few months ago, I came across a blog post written by my teacher, Eva Chukwunelo. She was radiant in the photos—smiling, confident, vibrant—and using a prosthetic limb. She spoke openly about her journey, not as a story of shame or brokenness, but of strength, choice, and dignity.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">One part struck me deeply: she said she doesn’t share every story—not out of fear or embarrassment, but because some things are simply personal. That moved me. She wasn’t hiding. She was honoring her boundaries and owning her narrative.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong>Eva isn’t just existing—she’s shining. She takes pictures, shows up for herself with grace and joy, and lives with a quiet confidence that makes me question everything I thought I understood about strength. She isn’t ashamed. She isn’t seeking sympathy. She is simply living—and living beautifully.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">Up until that moment, I had never truly confronted my own biases. Without meaning to, I had been one of those people who pitied others with physical differences. I avoided conversations. I assumed they were struggling or wanted to be invisible. But seeing Eva Chukwunelo, so full of life and self-worth, shook something in me. She wasn’t trying to be “inspirational”—she was just being herself.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">And then I began to notice more.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">I saw photos and stories of people who had lost limbs—some in accidents, some by birth—and yet there they were: dancing, running, modeling, creating, laughing. Not just surviving. Thriving.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">I saw Lauren Wasser, a model who walks the runway with golden prosthetic legs, exuding confidence and elegance. I discovered Kelly Knox, born without a forearm, who models with pride and challenges every narrow standard society tries to impose. I read about Jessica Quinn, who lost her leg to cancer and now works to reshape how we talk about confidence and beauty.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">Seeing these women—and knowing Eva—changed me. I realized something uncomfortable but true: we often discriminate without even realizing it. We look at someone with a missing limb, a deformed hand, or a prosthetic—and instead of admiration, we feel discomfort, pity, or awkwardness. But that discomfort belongs to us, not to them.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">We assume their lives are limited. We hesitate to include them in things like fashion, sports, or even everyday social settings. I used to think modeling was only for a certain kind of body. Now I understand how limited that mindset was.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">Beauty doesn’t come from perfection—it comes from authenticity, courage, and presence. These individuals are not just models in fashion—they are models of resilience, self-love, and possibility.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">Children born with physical differences also face a world that tells them, early and subtly, that they are “less than.” But they are artists, swimmers, writers, gamers, dancers, thinkers. What if we gave them spaces to express themselves fully? What if we designed our playgrounds, classrooms, and media with inclusion in mind—not just ramps, but representation?</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">We can include them in:</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">Modeling campaigns that celebrate all forms of beauty</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">Sports and dance programs that embrace adaptive techniques</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">STEM competitions and robotics clubs, where innovation meets lived experience</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">Media and storytelling, giving them space to speak on their own terms</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><h4><strong style="background-color: transparent;">Leadership programs and student councils, where their voices can shape the future</strong><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong><span style="background-color: transparent;"><strong>And beyond what we can do, what if we simply stopped staring? Stopped assuming? Stopped making it about “what’s missing”—and started seeing all that is present?</strong></span></h4><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">People with prosthetics, limb differences, and other physical conditions don’t need to be “fixed.” They need to be seen, respected, included, and celebrated. Not for existing—but for all they bring, and for challenging the narrow definitions of what it means to be whole.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">Eva Chukwunelo didn’t need me to pity her. She didn’t ask for that. What she gave me—without even knowing—was an invitation to grow. To reflect. To reframe. Her blog taught me more than any lecture ever could: that we must move beyond pity and lean into empathy, admiration, and true inclusion.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">I’m still learning. But now I’m doing it with open eyes—and a more open heart.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">I hope this reflection encourages you to pause and look differently too. The next time you see someone with a prosthetic limb or a physical difference, try not to look away—and definitely don’t look down. Look with respect. With curiosity. With equal humanity.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">Let’s challenge the way we’ve been taught to see beauty, strength, and worth.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;"><br/></strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">If this resonates with you—or even challenges you—I’d love to hear your thoughts.</strong></p><p><strong style="background-color: transparent;">Please feel free to leave your insight or reflection in the comments below. Let’s keep the conversation going.</strong></p><p><img alt="" src="/media/inline_insight_image/1000039999.png"/><strong style="background-color: transparent;"></strong></p>
"More Than What Meets the Eyes — inspired by th...
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments