Motherland. The Baby, The Bathwater

When i saw the insight Development Without the People by Bolu Tifeh, I was first attracted by the Cover Image, and then the headline hit me almost simultaneously. The image is quiet, but loud. <img alt="" src="/media/inline_insight_image/865ea1ee6c26f8239b4b64c88969b3eb.jpg"/> In the black-and-white stillness, a mother holds a baby close to her chest. Behind her stands the father, not saying much, not doing much either—just present in the background of a moment that clearly hurts. Around them is the aftermath of demolition. Homes broken. Walls flattened. The dust of what used to be someone’s life hanging stubbornly in the air. There are pictures you look at and move on from.And then there are pictures that ask you questions. This one asks a very uncomfortable one. <blockquote>What does development look like when the people who are supposed to benefit from it are standing in the rubble of their own lives?</blockquote> In the language of nations, we often use the word Motherland. It is a powerful word. It suggests warmth, protection, nurture, belonging. A mother is expected to care. To guide. To hold the fragile parts of life together until they become strong enough to stand. A child does not develop in isolation. A baby grows because there are arms to carry it.Because there is food to feed it.Because someone stays awake at night when it cries.Because someone believes its tomorrow matters. Development, in its purest sense, is not concrete and asphalt. It is care in policy form. It is the quiet assurance that those who lead understand that the people are not obstacles to progress—they are the very reason progress should exist. But sometimes, when you look closely at the Nigerian story—especially in cities like Lagos—you begin to wonder if the script got swapped somewhere along the way. The cranes move.The bulldozers arrive.The roads widen.The waterfronts transform.The masterplans glow beautifully in architectural presentations. Yet in the background of those plans are often families holding babies in front of broken homes. And you begin to see the contradiction. Because development that arrives like a storm and leaves people scattered is not growth—it is displacement wearing the clothes of progress. In parenting, there is a saying about throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It describes the mistake of discarding something precious while trying to get rid of something unwanted. It is a foolish act. A careless one. But when communities are demolished overnight in the name of modernization, when livelihoods disappear in the name of urban renewal, when people who built a place are suddenly told they no longer belong there, one begins to ask: <blockquote>How can we call Nigeria our Motherland when it sometimes feels like the baby has been thrown out with the bathwater?</blockquote> Because what is a motherland if the children are constantly running for cover? A real mother does not improve the house by pushing the children outside. She improves it with them inside. She renovates the roof while making sure everyone still has a room. She rearranges the furniture without turning the family into refugees. That is what thoughtful development looks like. Not just bigger roads, but safer lives,Not just modern skylines, but stable communities.Not just economic projections, but human dignity. Nigeria is not short of development conversations. Conferences are held. Panels are organised. Blueprints are drafted. Vision statements are printed in glossy documents. But the test of development is not in the beauty of the plan. It is in the well-being of the people standing in the plan’s shadow. If a mother feeds strangers while her own child is starving, we would question her priorities. Yet as a nation we sometimes celebrate infrastructure without asking the most basic question: Who is it truly serving? <blockquote>Because development without people is architecture.</blockquote> Development with people is civilization. And perhaps that is the deeper message hidden in that black-and-white image. The mother in the photograph is not part of the policy discussion that led to the demolition around her. The father behind her was probably not consulted when the future of that land was decided. The baby in her arms certainly had no voice in the masterplan. Yet they are the ones carrying the emotional cost of it. Their silence is the loudest commentary on the kind of development that forgets its own purpose. --- <blockquote>In the dust of broken walls A mother rocks tomorrow to sleep. The city calls it progress. The baby only knows the sound of loss.</blockquote> --- This is not an argument against development. No nation can grow by standing still. Cities must expand. Infrastructure must evolve. Economies must move forward. But the soul of development lies in how carefully it carries the people along. A mother who truly loves her child does not rush the process of growth so violently that the child gets hurt in the process. She understands that development is gradual. It is deliberate. It is humane. The same should be true of nations. Because when governments forget that the people are the heartbeat of the state, development begins to resemble something else entirely: a race toward modernity that leaves too many citizens watching from the sidelines of their own country. Nigeria deserves better than that. The idea of a Motherland should mean something deeper than geography. It should represent protection, belonging, and collective growth. It should mean that even in moments of change, the people are not treated as disposable parts of the national story. True development does not bulldoze its way into the future. It builds with the people, listens to the people, and protects the people. Because in the end, the greatness of a nation will never be measured only by its bridges, roads, and skyscrapers. It will be measured by whether the mother holding that baby in the dust still feels that the country behind her is home.

Other insights from Bigdan

Referral Earning

Points-to-Coupons