<p>This might disturb you</p><p>Sugar is sweet. Everyone says so. We don’t even question it is one of the first truths we are taught as children. You put it on your tongue, and your body tells you: this is sweetness. I put it on my tongue, and my body tells me the same thing. It seems simple, universal.</p><p>But if you really think about it, a question appears: how do I know that what I call sweet is what you call sweet?</p><p>The truth is, I don’t. I can never enter your body, never borrow your tongue, never live through your nervous system to test sugar the way you do. What I call sweet might be sharp, soft, warm, or electric in a way that I can’t even describe and yet, in your mouth, sugar may bloom into something entirely different.</p><p>We only agree on the word, not the actual experience. And that’s the unsettling part: our agreement might be nothing more than a coincidence of language. We’re not actually sharing a taste we’re only sharing a name.</p><p>Think about it: if you could step into my body for just a second, taste sugar as I taste it, you might recoil. You might say, “No, no, no… this is not how sugar tastes! This is not sweetness. This is something else.” And if I did the same with you, I’d probably say the same.</p><p>That’s the psychological truth hidden in the sugar test: each human being lives inside a private world of sensation and meaning. We are surrounded by others, yet locked inside ourselves. We pretend to share experiences, but in reality, we share only labels sweet, bitter, good, evil, joy, sadness. The labels connect us, but the raw experience itself is untranslatable.</p><p>And this doesn’t stop at sugar. It is the same with pain. My pain is not your pain, even if we both call it suffering. It is the same with love. My love is not your love, even if we both call it devotion. Every feeling, every thought, every spark of perception though we try to express it remains trapped inside our own skin.</p><p>This can be terrifying, if you really sit with it. It means we are more alone than we think. Even the people closest to us family, lovers, friends do not know what our world actually feels like. They know their world, they imagine ours, but they can never enter it completely.</p><p>And yet this is also the beauty of being human. Because even though we cannot fully cross into another person’s experience, we still reach out. We speak, we share, we compare, we write, we love. We say, “Sugar is sweet,” not because our sweetness is identical, but because that phrase becomes a fragile bridge between two isolated worlds. The words don’t erase the distance, but they let us at least wave across it.</p><p>Maybe this is why connection feels so powerful: because deep down, we know it is impossible to fully know another person, and yet we try anyway. We use language, art, music, touch anything that can hint at what lives inside us.</p><p>So, the sugar test is not about sugar at all. It is about life. It is about the way we each hold a reality that no one else can ever fully share. It is about the illusion of common experience, and the miracle that, despite this, we still manage to find each other.</p><p>So I ask you when you taste sugar, when you feel joy, when you suffer, when you love do you ever wonder if anyone in this world truly feels it the way you do? Or are we all simply alone in our tasting, united only by words, not by the experience itself?</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments