<p>What if I told you that Independence was a scam? That the labour of our heroes' past though honoured and hallowed forever in our Nation's story was a lie, a play on the grand stage of Global politics. </p><p><br></p><p>In school, I was taught about multiple tipping points that led to the successful fight for independence; one being the education of prominent citizens who fought the white men for independence, another being that our participation in foreign wars made us see through the mysticism that was the powerful white man. We saw that they were indeed mortals, mere flesh and blood. But over the years of reading, I have come to realise that like every good story, history is easily rewritten, edited and also can easily be made up.</p><p><br></p><p>To understand what happened and get the full story, we need to zoom out and expand our lens past the geography of Nigeria and see the world like the colonialists saw it, a chessboard with moving pieces and parts; i.e. any nation that wasn't predominantly white or European. Because there were 2 races at that time; the powerful whites and every other primitive inferior one. </p><p><br></p><p>Like the fight for intelligence, nuclear power or the space race, they competed for who had the most colonies. In that era, colonises signified power in the form of resources. After the abolition of slavery, they had to go for the next best thing, natural resources and if they could also get the minds of the best of that race working for them indirectly, was it really a loss?</p><p><br></p><p>They played the game of benevolent masters or vindictive and spiteful lords, depending on which got the job done, or which was more economically feasible. Because you see, wars have always been costly; preparing ammunition, paying men enough to risk their lives, providing food, water and welfare, and then shipping all these to a faraway land was a venture not to be taken lightly, especially if the reward was not high.</p><p><br></p><p>So, this was a period where the powers that be and European nations shared sovereign nations like a slice of pie, some getting the indigenes to sign documents which literally said they were under the protection of the colonial master. Just like gangsters telling you to pay protection money, except this document was a proof of ownership. They showed the other European nations the document and it meant "They are mine, stay clear." These were the rules of engagement among them, breaching it meant war because the first rule is "do not mess with the money." </p><p><br></p><p>A beautiful book I read called "A Peace to End All Peace" by David Fromkin speaks beautifully on how the British and other nations fought for and carved up the Ottoman Empire into what we now know as the Modern Middle East. Most importantly, it gave me an insight into why the British had to re-strategise their approach in other colonies, this is because those in the Middle East fought them nonstop. So they kept needing to move men around to recapture and defend territories that they had occupied. It costs them time, money and infrastructure. They made deals and counter-deals with different clans and even blood relatives, turning brother against brother and even father against son.</p><p><br></p><p>Then there was World War II, which put a massive strain on the power structure and world order. They used every resource available to them, including their colonies, conscripting them in a war that didn't directly affect them. The agitation, scuffles and struggles to put out the multiple fires in the different British colonies had left them stretched thin.</p><p><br></p><p>America spoke against the colony arrangement and a new agreement was made. The colonial masters were to pull out and give back sovereignty to the nations. But before they left, they had one more card up their sleeves.</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments