<p><strong><em>So... What Are You Really Studying?"</em></strong><br></p><p>This is an easy question to answer if you spend your days in high-tech labs, revolutionizing industries, or curing cancer. Not so much when your latest research topic is "<em>Lady Gaga and Pop Art.</em>" Suddenly, everyone looks at you like you just said, "<em>I analyze the migratory patterns of rubber ducks."</em></p><p>Because let’s be honest—when it comes to the grand hierarchy of research, the natural and physical sciences are often the undisputed champions. Engineers are out there building AI systems that will either revolutionize industries or—depending on how many sci-fi movies you’ve seen—eventually overthrow humanity. Medical researchers are working tirelessly to cure cancer. Physicists are unlocking the mysteries of the universe, discovering black holes, dark matter, and other things that make the rest of us feel intellectually inadequate. Meanwhile, a social scientist is writing a 200-page dissertation on the perception of <em>Turkish soap operas among Spanish audiences.</em></p><p>WhenI first came across this particular dissertation, my reaction was immediate: Surely, there are more pressing matters in the world. Shouldn’t we be focusing on stopping pandemics, reversing climate change, or at the very least, preventing AI from launching a robot uprising?</p><p>As a media studies researcher, I’d been having my own academic identity crisis. Every time I sat down to write a proposal, I felt the need to make it sound as serious and complicated as possible—as if stacking big words would make my research stand tall next to vaccine developers and quantum physicists. I wanted to be in the league of the "<em>world-changers,</em>" not the "<em>why-does-this-matter?</em>" researchers.</p><p>And that’s when I had to unlearn a deeply flawed perception:</p><p><strong>Social science isn’t less than—it’s just different.</strong></p><p>We like to measure impact in tangible results—lives saved, diseases cured, technologies built. But the truth is, scientific advancements are meaningless without human understanding. But how we communicate, interpret, and integrate these advancements into society? That’s a different kind of science—one that deals with culture, perception, and human behavior.</p><p>The world’s biggest problems aren’t just about science and technology. They’re about people.</p><p>A medical breakthrough only works if people trust and adopt it. AI needs ethical frameworks, policies, and human-centered design—all of which come from social research. Scientific progress without social understanding is just a faster way to repeat the mistakes of the past. And that’s why research on Turkish dramas actually matters. Because storytelling is power.</p><p>The way we consume media influences how we view culture, politics, and even international relations. That Turkish soap opera might not cure cancer, but it might explain how cultural narratives shape diplomacy, migration trends, and public sentiment—all of which have real-world consequences.</p><p>At the end of the day, knowledge isn’t a competition. Social science doesn’t exist to "support" natural science—it exists alongside it, shaping how discoveries become meaningful, ethical, and impactful. So, to my fellow social scientists: The next time someone raises an eyebrow at your research, just smile. The world might not always see our impact, but trust me—they feel it.</p><p><br></p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments