The High Court of Uganda has clarified the Appointing Authorities / Arbitral Institutions under the Ugandan Arbitration Law for the Ugandan Seated Arbitrations.
<p>The High Court in Misc. Cause No.2 of 2025 Labx Scientific Limited versus Katakwi District Local Government advised that parties are free to commence Arbitrations at the International Centre for Arbitration and Mediation in Kampala ICAMEK where the Arbitration Agreement refers disputes to Arbitration under the Laws of Uganda and the Parties fail to appoint an Arbitrator. <br/><br/>This follows the rationalization of the Center for Arbitration and Dispute Resolution CADER into a department in the Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs under the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act of 2024. Currently, the CADER is not fully constituted. </p><p>The High Court advised that there are two Arbitral Institutions that were given powers as Appointing Authorities under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act Cap 5 - CADER and ICAMEK. As such where CADER is not fully constituted to aid parties to appoint an Arbitrator, the parties have the option to file a Request of Arbitration at ICAMEK without requesting the court to Appoint an Arbitrator on their behalf. <br/><br/>The decision remains instructive on the Arbitral Institutions for Ugandan Seated Arbitrations. The decision also guides parties in negotiating Arbitration Agreements where they intend Uganda to be the seat of arbitrating their disputes. <br/><br/>For any further Advisory and Representation required on Arbitration matters from Negotiating Arbitration Agreements to Representation where disputes have arisen, Reach out to the Signum Advocates Commercial Arbitration Practice team. <br/><br/>ReachOutToUs.</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month.
The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments