Would Nigeria's Bola A. Tinubu earn himself a spotlight in the Guinness Book of Records just like Liberia's Charles D.B. King?
<span class="html-content"><p>As we all know, before something is documented into the Guinness Book of Records, it must be either positively or negatively unusual. In fact, such achievements are globally described as extreme and/or "meta-human". The Guinness Book of Records contains in it a myriad of unbelievable natural and artificially designed creatures as well as human achievements and world eventualities spanning through social, cultural, economic, legal, religious, and political projections and organisations from all over the world.
Politically, one of the mind-blowing and most significant event in the history of electoral fraud and election rigging that won a page in the World Guinness Book of Records is the 1927 Liberian Presidential election orchestrated by Charles Dunbar Burgess King. Born in Monrovia (Liberia's capital) on March 12 1871 by Sierra Leonean parents, Charles D.B. King became educated and gradually rose through the ranks of the legal profession. He later joined politics and contested for the number one political seat and position of Liberia in 1927.
The Liberia's Presidential election in 1927 between Charles D.B. King and his opponent Thomas Faulkner later came to be described as the worst ever case of electoral malpractice in history. This was evident as Charles defeated his opponent, Faulkner by scoring 243,000 votes as against Faulkner's 9,000 votes. However, what seem to be more confusing is how Charles got up to 243,000 votes when the registered number of voters in the country were less than 15,000? "Where did the more than two hundred extra votes come from and why was he declared the winner of the election even when it obvious that he rigged it?"was the question on everybody's lips".
A year after the election, his opponent, Thomas Faulkner brought up an allegation on Charles and his cabinet members. They are accused of criminality and impunity as they permitted slavery, forced labour and slave trade within the borders of Liberia. Faulkner also revealed that other government officials who worked with Charles were engaged in the forced shipping of labourers to the Spanish Island of Fernando Po and also were fond of using the Liberian Army (Frontier Force) to achieve this.
With this accusations came a massive wave of reactions from the international community. Meanwhile, a committee of the League of Nations was established to examine the authenticity of the allegations in order to ascertain what actually happened. In 1930, the committee provided a report of their findings. Named after the committee chairman "The Christy's Report", the report revealed that: persons holding official positions illegally misused their office in recruiting slaves in connivance with the Frontier Force; the shipment to Fernando Po and Gabon was associated with slavery because the method of recruiting was forceful and compelling; and not only Americo-Liberian government officials had benefited from forced labour, as a large foreign business operatives were also involved.</p>
<p>With the publication of the report, the House of Representatives initiated an impeachment procedure against Charles D.B. King. Fully aware of this process, he resigned thus escaping as public trial as spelled out in the Liberian constitution that: "No person shall be held to answer for a capital crime, except in case of impeachment". Charles's resignation although his strategy of survival, his personality was shaming and his rule, inefficient. He led Liberians through suffering and watched impunity overshadow his country.
Just as Charles D.B. King was not the popular choice of Liberians prior and during the 1927 Presidential election which made him engage in electoral malpractice, Nigeria's Bola A. Tinubu, the self-acclaimed next president of Nigeria "by turn", equally wears the same shoe. From all indication, he created a structure of electoral criminality and forced himself on Nigerians after the February 25th, 2023 elections.
Of course, like Charles, Bola would surround himself with like-minded friends and associates who would not only impoverish the citizenry the more, but would enslave and unleash more woes and penury on them.
As regards whether he would resign or be impeached, that is a matter of the "Supreme Court" to decide. But in all, it is quite pathetic to say that the 2023 Presidential election in Nigeria deserves to be documented into the Guinness Book of Records.</p>
</span>
Would Nigeria's Bola A. Tinubu earn himself a s...
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments