<p>You don’t notice when the letter starts changing its mind.</p><p><br/></p><p>At first, it’s small. A sentence feels slightly off when you reread it, like it’s lost a word you’re certain was there before. You assume you misremembered. You’ve been doing that a lot lately. Memory is flexible. That’s what you tell yourself.</p><p><br/></p><p>The letter agrees.</p><p><br/></p><p>It tells you memory is a kindness. That it smooths things over. That it edits out sharp edges so you can keep functioning. You relax a little when you read that. You like explanations that forgive you before you ask.</p><p><br/></p><p>The letter uses you because it knows you won’t argue with that. Second person feels intimate, but not invasive—at least not yet. You read it like a mirror you can step away from whenever you want.</p><p><br/></p><p>You don’t step away.</p><p><br/></p><p>Somewhere in the middle, the tone shifts. Not abruptly. Gently. Like a voice lowering itself so only you can hear. The sentences get shorter. Less descriptive. More certain.</p><p><br/></p><p>It says you were present.</p><p><br/></p><p>You start to object. Present doesn’t mean responsible. Present doesn’t mean anything. But the letter doesn’t accuse you. It just lists details. Things you remember without remembering why.</p><p><br/></p><p>The way you learned to pause before responding.</p><p>The way silence became your default answer.</p><p>The way you watched situations resolve themselves without you in them.</p><p><br/></p><p>You feel the urge to justify yourself. The letter doesn’t give you space.</p><p><br/></p><p>It says the dead are very good at noticing patterns. That once movement stops, repetition becomes obvious. That when you’re no longer distracted by survival, you see how often the same choices get made.</p><p><br/></p><p>You don’t like being categorized.</p><p><br/></p><p>You skip a paragraph.</p><p><br/></p><p>The next one begins mid-thought, as if it noticed you leaving and hurried to keep up.</p><p><br/></p><p>It says you were never cruel. That would have been easier. Cruelty leaves evidence. What you did left impressions—soft, overlapping, deniable. The kind that fade unless someone presses on them.</p><p><br/></p><p>You feel something press now.</p><p><br/></p><p>The letter starts referring to moments you didn’t know mattered. Things you dismissed because nothing happened. A message you didn’t send. A look you didn’t return. A time you noticed someone unraveling and decided it wasn’t your place.</p><p><br/></p><p>You tell yourself you couldn’t have known.</p><p><br/></p><p>The letter asks why you keep using that phrase.</p><p><br/></p><p>You pause. That wasn’t written a second ago.</p><p><br/></p><p>You scroll up. The sentence is there, calm and patient, like it’s always been waiting.</p><p><br/></p><p>The letter begins to repeat itself. Not verbatim—structurally. You notice phrases echoing in different forms. You didn’t mean to. You didn’t know. You stayed quiet. Each one appears slightly altered, as if tested, refined.</p><p><br/></p><p>You wonder who it’s practicing on.</p><p><br/></p><p>There’s a section describing a death.</p><p><br/></p><p>It avoids specifics. No blood. No impact. Just a gradual narrowing. A life shrinking to the size of the space it’s allowed to occupy. You feel an odd detachment reading it, like the event happened far away, to someone you only partially recognize.</p><p><br/></p><p>Then the letter says something wrong.</p><p><br/></p><p>It says: You remember standing there after.</p><p><br/></p><p>You don’t.</p><p><br/></p><p>You’re sure of that. The certainty feels good—solid. You hold onto it.</p><p><br/></p><p>The letter doesn’t argue.</p><p><br/></p><p>It simply continues as if you had agreed.</p><p><br/></p><p>It talks about aftermath. About how things return to normal faster than expected. About how routines absorb absence. About how easy it is to step into the space left behind and call it coincidence.</p><p><br/></p><p>You feel watched—not from outside, but from inside your own thoughts. Like something is reviewing them as you have them.</p><p><br/></p><p>The letter starts using phrases you associate with yourself. Expressions you don’t remember teaching anyone. You assume it’s a coincidence until it does it again. And again.</p><p><br/></p><p>You check the end.</p><p><br/></p><p>You wish you hadn’t.</p><p><br/></p><p>The ending is… unfinished. It cuts off mid-sentence. No closure. No summary. Just a thought abandoned like it expects to be picked up later.</p><p><br/></p><p>By you.</p><p><br/></p><p>You scroll back to the middle.</p><p><br/></p><p>A paragraph you’re certain you skipped before is there now. It describes someone reading a letter and slowly realizing they’re being described more accurately than they’d like. You feel a chill at the precision. The timing is too exact.</p><p><br/></p><p>You start reading faster.</p><p><br/></p><p>The letter slows down.</p><p><br/></p><p>It says panic is inefficient. That denial lasts longer when it’s quiet. That most people don’t realize they’ve crossed a line because nothing marks the crossing.</p><p><br/></p><p>You feel like you’re approaching something. Or something is approaching you. The distinction matters less than it should.</p><p><br/></p><p>The final paragraph appears without warning.</p><p><br/></p><p>It says the letter doesn’t exist to accuse or absolve. It exists to continue. To hold the parts of you that were never examined. To keep asking the questions you avoided by surviving.</p><p><br/></p><p>It says the dead don’t haunt places.</p><p><br/></p><p>They haunt narratives.</p><p><br/></p><p>And you have been telling this one wrong.</p><p><br/></p><p>The last line blinks once before settling:</p><p><br/></p><p>You’re still reading because some part of you is waiting to be corrected.</p><p><br/></p><p>The cursor remains.</p><p><br/></p><p>The letter waits.</p><p><br/></p><p>So do you.</p><p><br/></p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments