Most definitely, biases are simply the lens through which we process information.
Often, there's presentation bias where just because a startup isn't able to communicate well, it's easy to conclude that they're not doing anything noteworthy, sometimes it's not so. It can also be the reverse where there's a lot of hype but no substance. I'm aware of these and lookout for this.
Prior knowledge or preconceived notions also play a part in clouding my judgement. To mitigate this I just go ahead and still listen in on a conversation or take a call to learn more about the situation.
For me, recalibrating myself starts with remembering and returning to what my editorial objectives are. I'm trying to shed more light on an important story or explain a concept. I strive to simply look at the facts and simply state them.
For instance, there's a story I'm currently working on that I sincerely doubt the startup is legit and many people share the same sentiment but I'm a journalist, those things don't matter. My job is to simply listen to different parties and gather enough information. You don't just wake up and decide someone is lying, you have to prove beyond reasonable doubt that that's the case.
The author of the article argues that biases are not necessarily evil, they simply exist because the answer to the big questions of life many times can't be answered by facts. They then go on to make a case that we should seek to improve and refine our biases rather than trying to ignore them. I agree with this and think it's worth considering in the quest for objectivity.
At the end of each month, we give out cash prizes to 5 people with the best insights in the past month
as well as coupon points to 15 people who didn't make the top 5, but shared high-quality content.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments