If you believe the African Commission has put a legal framework in place in respect to freedom of expression and digital rights, what are those underlying factors that you think have inhibited this legal framework or guidance to be issued by the African Commission. Or in any case why has the African Commission kept silent.
The African Commission has not laid down procedure to supervise the implementation of its recommendations. However, the secretariat sends letters of reminders to states that have been found to have violated provisions of the charter to recognize the rights, duties and freedoms enshrined in the Charter and adopt legislative measures and other measures to give effects to these rights ..
The first letters are sent after the adoption of the commission's annual Activity Report by the AU Assembly of heads of States and government and subsequent letters are sent as often as neccesary.
The major problem however is that of enforcement.
There is no mechanism that compels states to abide by these recommendations.
But for states that are party to the protocol to the African Charter on Human and people's rights on the establishment of the African court on human and people's rights (the African court Protocol) there is always a likelihood that the African Commission will take the cases to the African court if the state concerned fails to abide by its recommendations.
Infact , Rule 118(1) of the ACHPR Rules provides that if the commission has taken a decision with respect to a communication and considers that the concerned State has either not complied or is unwilling to comply with its recommendations within the prescribed time limit , the ACHPR may submit the communication to the African Court pursuant to Article 5(1)a of the African Court Protocol and inform the parties accordingly.
At the end of each month, we give out cash prizes to 5 people with the best insights in the past month
as well as coupon points to 15 people who didn't make the top 5, but shared high-quality content.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments