<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">In our present day society which is fast paced and diverse, certain things remain unchanged. People have various sources of information to consume, ranging from newspapers, radios, TVs or news websites. However, there are cases where one and the same information can be narrated differently by each media, while some may choose not to narrate the story at all. Such circumstances are greatly influenced by the editorial policy of each media organ.</span></p><p>The editorial policy refers to the guiding principles, rules and values upheld by media houses that determine what should be broadcast to the public. It defines the journalistic identity, credibility and orientation of the media house.
</p><p>Several factors make up the editorial policy of a media house, notably purpose, accuracy and objectivity, respect of ethics etc., and while media houses share common factors like respect of ethics and accuracy, other factors like impartiality may not be common. There are some media houses that choose to focus on the good aspects of a story they cover.
</p><p>For example, a news magazine can focus on fashion and culture of a people, a radio channel can focus on health in general, a TV channel can be strictly religious, or a news website can focus on technology and mechanics. For each of these examples, the media houses will ensure that latest news updates, programmes and documentaries revolve around the chosen domain.
</p><p>While most media organs have similar sources of funding, their missions and editorial independence are different. This is what makes some of them to be Public Service Broadcasters (PSBs) while others are State Broadcasters (SBs) . A clear-cut example being the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) being a public service broadcaster and the Cameroon Radio and Television (CRTV) being a state broadcaster.
</p><p>This will be explained further in another insight. Until then, can you think of some features that make PSBs different from SBs? Or to you are they the same?</p>
At the end of each month, we give out cash prizes to 5 people with the best insights in the past month
as well as coupon points to 15 people who didn't make the top 5, but shared high-quality content.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments