Nigeria’s future might depend on our local languages

I was scrolling on Twitter recently when a post stopped my thumb mid-swipe. A man was explaining, quite reasonably, why his kids speak French and English fluently but not Igbo. He'd argued this with his own father a thousand times, he said, and his logic was simple: the world is progressing while Nigeria regresses, most people are trying to leave the country, and 10 out of 10 times, nobody is using Igbo in a "white man's land." French and English open doors. Igbo, in his view, mostly serves people headed for a career in Igbo or Yoruba film and entertainment. As a personal decision for one father raising his own children, I understand the logic completely, and I have no interest in telling any parent how to raise their kids. But the post kept nagging at me for a different reason. It was making a private, sensible choice, and in doing so, quietly missing something much bigger about Nigeria as a whole. Not everyone needs to be designing their life around Nigeria's future. Plenty of people, reasonably, are optimizing for their own family, their own mobility, their own children's best shot at a good life wherever that life happens to unfold. But for the people who are interested in Nigeria's future, who see themselves playing some role in building the country rather than simply leaving it, this is a question worth sitting with far more seriously than a Twitter reply allows. Because the same instinct that makes a family abandon its native tongue for "global" languages, multiplied across an entire generation of the country's most capable people, is part of what has quietly hollowed out Nigeria's leadership class. The First Rule of Leadership Nobody Says Out Loud I've spent a long time thinking about nation building, not as an abstract academic subject, but as a puzzle: what actually makes leadership work? Strip away the theories, the case studies, the TED-talk language of "vision" and "charisma," and you're left with one unglamorous, foundational truth: You cannot lead people you cannot communicate with. Giving a speech and having a conversation are two very different acts, and that difference is the entire game of politics in a country like Nigeria. Consider the scale of the problem. Nigeria is home to roughly 230 million people. A large share are semi-literate or non-literate in English. Most are native-tongue speakers first, and everything else second. When a leader stands in front of that reality and speaks only in the polished, foreign-accented English of an elite boarding school, he is building a wall without meaning to. He is telling an enormous portion of the population, unintentionally: *this message was not written for you.* The Lee Kuan Yew Lesson Here's a story worth sitting with. Lee Kuan Yew, the man who took Singapore from a swampy port with no natural resources to one of the wealthiest nations on earth, began his political career as, in his own words, a thoroughly British-trained lawyer. Educated in England. Fluent in the Queen's English. Utterly comfortable in the rooms of global power. But he did not speak Malay or Hokkien fluently, the languages of the ordinary people he needed to convince, organize, and eventually govern. He recognized early, not late, not after losing an election, but early, that this was a fatal gap. So he did something almost nobody expects from an elite: he sat down and learned. He drilled himself in Malay and Hokkien until, by several accounts, he spoke them with a fluency that rivaled native speakers. This wasn't sentimentality. It was strategy. Lee Kuan Yew understood something a lot of brilliant, foreign-polished people never learn: credibility with the masses is not given, it's earned in their own language. You don't get to skip that step because you have a better passport or a sharper accent. Why the "Grassroots Politician" Keeps Winning This brings me to a pattern that should embarrass Nigeria's intellectual and professional class far more than it does: the "bush politician," the supposedly unsophisticated grassroots operator, keeps outmaneuvering the polished, foreign-trained technocrat, election after election, city after city. The masses are not unsophisticated. The grassroots politician simply does something the technocrat refuses to: he speaks the language of the people, literally and figuratively. He shows up sounding like their uncle, their neighbor, their own reflection. When people look at a leader and see themselves, their struggles, their accent, their inflections, their proverbs, something happens that no policy paper can manufacture: **trust**. Trust is not built through competence alone. It is built through recognition, and recognition, more often than not, is spoken. Meanwhile, too much of Nigeria's intellectual class treats foreignness as a badge of superiority: pride in the acquired accent, the imported vocabulary, the carefully cultivated distance from anything that sounds "local." Then that same class turns around, baffled, asking why the masses don't trust them, why they lose elections to men they consider intellectually inferior. The answer is sitting in plain sight. You cannot build a following with people you've spent your whole life signaling distance from. Both, Not Either To be clear, this isn't an argument against foreign education, foreign languages, or global fluency. Nigeria absolutely needs leaders who can walk into a room in Washington, Beijing, or Brussels and hold their own. Worldliness isn't the enemy here; parochialism dressed up as principle would be its own kind of failure. The choice being offered, English or Igbo, foreign or native, global or local, is a false one. The most effective leaders in history have been bilingual not just in language but in identity: fluent in the vocabulary of diplomacy and development, and equally fluent, equally comfortable, in the tongue of home. A leader who can quote development economics in a boardroom in London and then turn around and explain that same vision, unpretentiously, in Igbo or Yoruba or Hausa to a market woman in Onitsha or Ibadan, has a reach no purely "global" figure will ever have. That leader holds a door the technocrat doesn't: the door of trust. The Stakes Are the Whole Country If Nigeria is going to raise a new generation of leaders capable of actually building the nation rather than merely managing its decline, that generation cannot be disconnected from its roots. Native language isn't a nostalgic accessory to leadership. It is the infrastructure of trust, and trust is the currency every genuine reform is purchased with. This is not the moment for the country's most exposed, most educated, most globally fluent minds to abandon their native tongues in the name of progress. It is precisely the moment to hold both: the language of the world stage, and the language of the people whose faith they're asking for. In the end, no vision, however brilliant, travels further than the language it's spoken in. The future of the country may well depend on it.

Other insights from Tomi Walker

Referral Earning

Points-to-Coupons