Propaganda I'm Not Falling For: Men Are Naturally Polygamous
<p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>Welcome back to my series on the "propaganda" I’m just not buying into. Today, I'm tackling a persistent and often problematic claim used to justify certain behaviors: the idea that men are "naturally polygamous."</p><p><br/></p><p>This propaganda is a convenient narrative that often gets trotted out to excuse infidelity or a reluctance to commit. It suggests that male biology inherently drives men to seek multiple partners, implying that monogamy is an unnatural constraint, a societal imposition that goes against their intrinsic nature. This idea is frequently supported by selective evolutionary psychology or anecdotal evidence, framing men's desires for variety as an unchangeable biological imperative. It can subtly—or not so subtly—absolve men of responsibility for their choices and place the burden of understanding or acceptance on their female partners.</p><p><br/></p><p>I'm not falling for it. While human sexuality is complex and varies greatly among individuals, reducing men's capacity for faithfulness to a blanket biological dictate is an oversimplification that ignores the vast spectrum of human experience and choice. To claim "natural polygamy" as an excuse dismisses the very real capacity for emotional connection, commitment, and loyalty that countless men exhibit every single day. It also overlooks the powerful role of societal norms, cultural expectations, and individual values in shaping sexual behavior.</p><p><br/></p><p>The idea that men are *naturally* incapable of monogamy is propaganda that undermines men's emotional depth and their ability to make conscious, ethical choices in relationships. It gives a free pass to behavior that requires accountability and respect. For me, human relationships are built on mutual respect, trust, and shared values, not on sweeping biological generalizations that absolve individuals of their responsibilities.</p>
At the end of each month, we give out cash prizes to 5 people with the best insights in the past month
as well as coupon points to 15 people who didn't make the top 5, but shared high-quality content.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments