The 2022 Blockchain Year. A legal perspective of the Lows
In this insight I sum up this year to look at two events.
- The Fall of the #TerraEcosystem.
- The collapse of #FtxExchange .
A case for Developer liability and Consumer and Investor Protection.
PART 1
1. The Fall of the Terra Ecosystem
#context
Founded and Launched in the #TerraLabs in 2018 by Do Kwon and others, it operated on the Cosmos SDK a network that allows other people to develop their own Blockchain products. We look at three components (relevant), the Luna Token, the UST token and the Luna Foundation Guard. The tokens were native to the network and were stable coins with the UST hovering over the price of the dollar. Unlike other stable coins backed by fiat or physical goods, the Terra tokens worked under an algorithmic smart contract. Where the price of the UST increased, more Luna tokens would be burnt to create UST and vice versa to keep the coin stable this was automatic using the algorithmic smart contract.
With a market cap of 15Billion $ in March 2022. The UST got depegged from the dollar and didnot rise again leading to the collapse. the Luna Guard Foundation failed to stabilize the Eco system.
#Cryptolegalities
It should be noticed that this seemed to be a perfect calculation by a developer to ensure that the system was stable using a written code smart contract.
This is where we discuss Developer Liability. From the concept in tort negligence - the neighbor principles. A developer's neighbor is the user of the product. The final consumer. Developer liability has been applied in construction law and other areas. it should be applied to #blockchain #crypto
PART 2
The Collapse of FTX Crypto Exchange.
#context
Founded in May 2019 by Sam Bankman Fried and others in the Bahamas, FTX operated as a centralized crypto exchanges but aswell offered a Blockchain token called the FTT and made various deals and collaboration using it's Decentralized Autonomous Organisation the FTTDAO.
On 2nd Nov. 2022, CoinDesk published an article with various allegations on FTX and it's sister company's (Alameda Research founded by Sam Bankman Fried) balance sheet. It alleged that Alameda's Balance sheet comprised of almost half of the FTT in circulation and made a conclusion that Alameda Research was still in operation using the funds from FTX's Depositors. The next day Bainance's CEO tweeted that they intended to transfer all their FTT assets back to FTX. This led to panic, various withdrawals that FTX could not implement and hence a liquidity crisis. A story of unfaithful love! FTX filed for Bankruptcy
#cryptolegalities
John Jay Ray's Affidavit in support of the bankruptcy at paragraph 5 stated, "Never in my career have I seen such a failure of corporate controls and such complete absence of trustworthy financial information as accrued here." This is why we need corporate controls in financial matters. Summarily these are principled on #consumerprotection #investorprotection
Crypto 2022!!!!!
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments