The Olodo Uprising: Are We Rewarding Ignorance or Authenticity?
<p>Seveentin!<br/></p><p>Yeah like she couldn’t spell it.</p><p>It’s SEVENTEEN </p><p>I know how to spell, before you group me with the <em>olodos</em>. </p><p>I went to get a ring light last week after all the back and forth, we agreed on a price time to write receipt <em>nau</em> , babygirl couldn’t spell 17. </p><p>Before we all start pointing fingers, there’s a saying that say learning never stops. </p><p>That <em>olodo</em> may know something that you dont *clapping*</p><p><strong>Hello ooo</strong></p><p>But I’m not here to support any party</p><p>Someone turns on a ring light, says something completely outrageous or proudly admits they don't know the simplest things and suddenly they're trending. Brands notice them. They gain followers. They make money.</p><p>That's when I paused and asked myself:</p><p>This reward we keep talking about, exactly what is it?</p><p>The recent conversations around the Olodo Uprising keep asking one question: Are we rewarding ignorance or authenticity?</p><p>At first, I thought the answer was obvious.</p><p>Now, I'm not so sure.</p><p>Because the more I think about it, the less I believe this conversation is really about "Olodos."</p><p>I think it's about money.</p><p>Let's be honest.</p><p>Life is expensive.</p><p>People are looking for opportunities wherever they can find them, and social media has become one of the fastest ways to earn an income. Don’t get me wrong o, I’m not judging anyone for wanting to escape being broke because it's not easy.</p><p>But somewhere along the line, we discovered something else.</p><p><em>Ignorance sells.</em></p><p>Or at least, what I like to call <strong>authentic ignorance</strong>.</p><p>Sometimes it's genuine. Sometimes it's exaggerated. Sometimes it's carefully performed because people have realised that acting clueless can generate more engagement than being informed ever could.</p><p>Whether it's intentional or not it almost doesn't matter anymore.</p><p>If it gets attention, it gets rewarded.</p><p>And social media is more than willing to do the rewarding.</p><p>Algorithms don't ask whether something is thoughtful.</p><p>They ask whether people stopped scrolling.</p><p>Whether people commented.</p><p>Shared.</p><p>Argued.</p><p>Mocked.</p><p>Engagement has become the currency, and outrage often spends better than intelligence.</p><p>Now, before anyone points fingers...</p><p>I'm not a saint either.</p><p>Lately, I've doomscrolling myself.</p><p>I've laughed at content I knew wasn't adding anything to my life.</p><p>I've watched videos simply because everyone else was watching them.</p><p>Which made me realise something uncomfortable:</p><p>We are not just consumers.</p><p>We're participants.</p><p>Every view, every comment, every repost helps decide what succeeds online.</p><blockquote>It’s not just a Gen Z issue anymore,It's all of us.</blockquote><p>Somewhere along the way, we lost patience.</p><p>We don't always want detailed explanations anymore.</p><p>We want quick answers.</p><p>Quick laughs.</p><p>Quick opinions.</p><p>If an idea takes too long to explain, many people move on before it even has the chance to make sense.</p><blockquote>And when patience disappears, so does the space for depth.</blockquote><p>The easiest content wins.</p><p>The loudest voice wins.</p><p>The simplest narrative wins.</p><p>So, are we rewarding ignorance?</p><p>Sometimes.</p><p>Are we rewarding authenticity?</p><p>Sometimes.</p><p>But I think we're mostly rewarding whatever keeps us watching.</p><p>I spoke about it in one of my articles but that relates to Nigeria. </p><p>The "Olodo Uprising" didn't happen in isolation.</p><p>It grew in an environment where attention is profIt grew in an environment where attention is profitable, authenticity is marketable, controversy is clickable, and money is often the prize waiting at the end.</p><p>Maybe the better question isn't whether we're rewarding ignorance or authenticity.</p><p>Maybe we should ask ourselves:</p><p><strong>What kind of society are we creating when the quickest route to success is often the one that asks the least of us?</strong></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month.
The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments