True
6711;
Score | 11
In People and Society 6 min read
When the Joke Becomes the Compass
<p><br/></p><p><em>"You can enjoy a funny video without making its creator your moral compass"</em></p><p>☝️ See this guy up here… yes, that guy.</p><p>I watched one of this guy’s videos and I could swear I was losing brain cells.</p><p>Not slowly either.</p><p>They were leaving in groups like Nigerians running into their houses because somebody shouted, “Up NEPA!”</p><p>I watched the video again. For research, obviously 👀. </p><p>I was trying to understand the appeal: the timing, the shouting, the confidence, and the complete absence of the tiny internal voice that says, “Maybe do not say that in public.”</p><p>Nothing.</p><p>Just vibes.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>The Brain Cells Have Left the Chat</strong></p><p>And somehow, the vibes were winning...</p><p>The video had views. The video had comments. The video had people laughing, defending, sharing, tagging their friends, and doing that Nigerian thing where we pretend to hate something while making sure it reaches everybody we know.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>We Are the Monster We Made</strong></p><p>That was when I stopped watching Peller and started watching us.</p><p>Because Peller is not the entire problem. He is the visible part of it, the face, ring light, microphone, and attention that make everybody else uncomfortable.</p><p>The uncomfortable truth is that we did not discover Peller. </p><p>We produced him.</p><p>Then we gave him an audience.</p><p>Then we gave the audience a reason to return.</p><p>Then we complained that he was becoming influential.</p><p><strong>This is the Olodo Uprising.</strong></p><p><strong><br/></strong></p><p><strong>The Problem Is Not the Accent</strong></p><p>Not the uprising of people who did not attend university. Not the uprising of people who speak imperfect English. Not the uprising of poor people who found a way to make legitimate money in an economy that has become hostile to almost every traditional path.</p><p>The problem is not that somebody can be successful without sounding like a textbook.</p><p>The problem is <em><strong>when ignorance becomes a costume, confidence becomes a substitute for competence, and the costume becomes more profitable than the competence.</strong></em></p><p>That is a different problem.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>What We Know</strong></p><p>The Guardian describes the “Olodo Uprising” as a wider trend in which creators who lack traditional academic polish gain enormous fame by being raw, relatable, or deliberately performative about their lack of formal knowledge. Supporters see entertainment and economic survival. Critics see the celebration of mediocrity.</p><p><strong><em><br/></em></strong></p><p><strong style="">Education and Intelligence Are Not Identical Twins</strong></p><p>Both sides are right about something.</p><p>A university degree is not a certificate of wisdom. We have all met graduates who can write “congratulations” under a Facebook post but cannot spell it correctly. We have also met people who never attended university but can build businesses, solve problems, and understand human beings better than people with three degrees and a LinkedIn bio written in corporate fog.</p><p>Education and intelligence are related. They are not identical twins. But authenticity is not the same as refusing to learn, and being relatable should not mean that every form of discipline is elitist.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Attention Is How We Voted</strong></p><p>Somewhere between the first person who said, “<em>This boy is funny</em>” and the millionth person who reposted the clip, we made a decision.</p><p>Perhaps not consciously. Perhaps not in a meeting. No one sat under a fluorescent light and passed a motion titled, “Let us reward nonsense.”</p><p>It happened through attention.</p><p>One click.</p><p>One share.</p><p>One laugh.</p><p>One “this guy don finish me.”</p><p>Then another.</p><p>Attention is currency. I wrote that before. We spend it every day, and the market notices.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>You Cast Your Votes. The Machine Collated Them.</strong></p><p>The algorithm does not ask whether the content made us wiser. It asks whether it kept us watching.</p><p>Did you stay?</p><p>Did you replay?</p><p>Did you send it to your friend?</p><p>Did you argue for forty-five minutes with a stranger who has “No DMs” in his bio?</p><p>Congratulations.</p><p>The machine has recorded your vote.</p><p>This is why the debate is bigger than Peller. It is about what the machine learns from us. It learns that outrage is useful. It learns that spectacle travels faster than substance. It learns that a person can be mocked and promoted at the same time.</p><p>We laugh at the Olodo.</p><p>Then we make him famous.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Bread, Circuses, and Nigerian Oxygen</strong></p><p>The Roman poet Juvenal gave the world the phrase panem et circenses—bread and circuses. It is often simplified into a story about rulers distracting citizens with food and entertainment while power continues elsewhere. History is more complicated, and entertainment is not automatically manipulation. Still, the comparison is useful. </p><p><br/></p><p>A society under pressure needs relief. Nigeria is under pressure: rent, food, transport, unemployment, insecurity. Everybody is looking for somewhere to put the weight down for five minutes.</p><p>So people laugh.</p><p>Of course they laugh.</p><p>Sometimes laughter is not ignorance. Sometimes laughter is the last affordable form of oxygen.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>When Relief Becomes a System</strong></p><p>But relief can become a system.</p><p>When entertainment becomes the only thing we are consistently offered, when every national frustration is converted into content, and when the public is encouraged to debate the performer instead of the conditions producing the performance, then the circus begins to do political work—whether or not anybody planned it that way.</p><p>We stop asking why schools are failing, why degrees no longer guarantee opportunity, or why young people have to monetise every aspect of their lives. We just ask who is trending.</p><p>And tomorrow, we ask again.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>The Digital Window and the Locked Front Door</strong></p><p>This is where I understand Ycee’s frustration. His “Olodo Uprising” comment was not simply an attack on one content creator. According to reports, he was describing a broader shift from the glorification of “Yahoo culture” to what he called “Peller culture”: a world where virality, sensationalism, and online celebrity can appear more valuable than study, craft, and intellectual discipline<strong>. </strong></p><p><strong><br/></strong></p><p><strong>But I also understand why people pushed back.</strong></p><p><strong><br/></strong></p><p><strong><em>It is easy to criticise the person who escaped through the digital window when the front door of the economy has been locked for years.</em></strong></p><p>Tell a Nigerian graduate to go back to school. Fine. With what money?</p><p>Tell a young person to build a professional career slowly. Fine. Where is the job?</p><p>At some point, “get educated” starts sounding less like advice and more like an insult from people who already got access.</p><p>That does not mean abandoning education. It means admitting that education is also a public system. If the country underfunds schools, leaves graduates unemployed, and then complains that young people prefer internet fame, the country is not being honest<strong>.</strong></p><p>The roof is shaking because the foundation has been ignored.</p><p>The Peller phenomenon did not fall from the sky. It grew in the soil we prepared.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Different Stage. Same Audience. Same Applause.</strong></p><p>Our public culture sometimes rehearses the habits we criticise in government: noise instead of competence, performance instead of delivery, confidence instead of accountability, and distraction whenever the real question becomes uncomfortable.</p><p>Citizens do not have the same power as presidents, ministers, or wealthy platforms. But a country’s public behaviour is not unrelated to its political character.</p><p><strong><br/></strong></p><p><strong>We Are the Room</strong></p><p>Peller may be standing at the front of the room.</p><p>But we are the room.</p><p>We are the people laughing.</p><p>We are the people reposting.</p><p>We are the people turning the clip into a sound, the sound into a trend, and the trend into a career.</p><p>We are also the people now holding a conference about the consequences.</p><p><strong><br/></strong></p><p><strong>The Moral Compass Problem</strong></p><p>This is the part where somebody will say, “So you want to cancel everybody?”</p><p>No.</p><p>I want us to become more intelligent consumers of entertainment.</p><p><strong><em>You can enjoy a funny video without making its creator your moral compass. </em></strong>You can support a content creator without pretending that every statement they make is profound.</p><p>Authenticity should mean that a person is honest about who they are.</p><p><br/></p><p>It should not mean that they are proud of remaining exactly where they are.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Pleasure Without Intellectual Surrender</strong></p><p>The goal is not to silence entertainers or shame people without formal education. The goal is to build a culture where creativity can earn attention without competence being treated like an enemy.</p><p><br/></p><p>We need comedians, musicians, streamers, teachers, scientists, writers, engineers, farmers, nurses, and people<strong> </strong>who can explain a complicated thing without turning it into a shouting match.</p><p>Yes, We need pleasure<strong>.</strong></p><p>We also need depth.</p><p><br/></p><p>A country cannot meme its way out of poor schools. It cannot dance its way out of unemployment. At some point, somebody has to read the policy, understand the system, repair the thing, teach the class, build the road, and ask the question nobody wants trending<strong>.</strong></p><p><br/></p><p><strong>So, What Exactly Are We Rewarding?</strong></p><p>So, are we rewarding ignorance or authenticity?</p><p>Sometimes we are rewarding authenticity.</p><p>Sometimes we are rewarding survival.</p><p>Sometimes we are rewarding entrepreneurship.</p><p>And sometimes, let us be honest, we are rewarding ignorance because ignorance is entertaining, easy to package, and profitable to distribute.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>We Bought the Ticket</strong></p><p>The question is not whether Peller is the Olodo Uprising.</p><p>The question is whether we are the uprising’s audience, investors, publicity team, and unpaid public-relations department.</p><p>Because we cannot keep pointing at the performer while pretending we did not buy the ticket.</p><p>The algorithm is not a god.</p><p>It is a mirror with a business model.</p><p><br/></p><p>And lately, it has been showing us exactly what we keep asking to see.</p><p><strong><br/></strong></p><p><strong><br/></strong></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>

Competition entry | The Olodo Uprising

|
Tip the olodo.

Other insights from .

Referral Earning

Points-to-Coupons


Insights for you.
What’s stopping you?
369 views
21 upvotes
26 comments
What is TwoCents? ×