I got rejected 42 times before I figured out what actually works.
<p>For six months, I was a ghost. </p><p><br/></p><p>I’d hit "submit," refresh my inbox, and—nothing. Not even a "sorry, no." Just silence. </p><p><br/></p><p>I did everything they tell you to do: </p><p>- Rewrote my résumé 11 times. </p><p>- Spent $79 on a "professional" template. </p><p>- Memorized every buzzword in my industry. </p><p><br/></p><p>Still. Nothing. </p><p><br/></p><p>Then, on the 43rd try, I snapped. I was exhausted, angry, and completely out of fucks to give. </p><p><br/></p><p>So I scrapped the corporate-speak and wrote this at the end of my application: </p><p><br/></p><p>> "<strong>Look, I don’t have every skill you listed. But I learn fast, I work harder than anyone you’ll meet, and if you take a chance on me, I’ll make sure you never regret it."</strong></p><p><br/></p><p><strong>That’s the email that got me a reply.</strong></p><p>That’s the one that led to a call. </p><p>That’s the one that got me the job. </p><p><br/></p><p>Turns out, after 300 generic applications, recruiters don’t remember the "highly motivated team player." </p><p><br/></p><p>They remember the person who sounded like a *real human.* </p><p><br/></p><p>— <strong>So if you’re stuck in the rejection loop, try this:</strong></p><p>Stop trying to be perfect. Start trying to be <strong>you</strong>.</p><p><br/></p><p>👇 <strong>What’s the one thing you wish you’d known before your last job hunt?</strong></p><p>(Maybe your lesson helps someone else break the cycle.) </p>
I got rejected 42 times before I figured out wh...
ByMishael Egbegi
0:00 /
0:00
|
Want to support my work? Drop a tip below—every bit fuels more honest career advice like this! 💛 (Only if you're able, no pressure.)
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month.
The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments