<p><sub>In Law of Torts class, we talk a lot about damages. We learn that <strong>for every wrong, there must be a remedy; for every loss, a quantifiable cost. </strong>The law hates a vacuum. It demands evidence, witnesses, and a clear chain of causation.</sub></p><p><sub>But as I sit in the back of the lecture hall, my highlighter hovering over a paragraph on negligence, I am privately litigating a case that no High Court in Abuja would ever take.</sub></p><p><sub><br/></sub></p><p><sub>The Plaintiff: My ego, bruised and demanding a refund for time spent. For lengthy late night calls. </sub></p><p><sub>The Defendant: A ghost. A person who was once my <strong>"co-counsel"</strong> in life, now turned hostile witness.</sub></p><p><sub>The Charge: Emotional Abandonment.</sub></p><p><sub><br/></sub></p><p><sub>The problem with being a law student in love is that you start looking for a <strong>"burden of proof" </strong>in a text message that never arrived. You go through the archives of your WhatsApp chats like they are bundles of evidence. You <strong>cross-examine</strong> old selfies, looking for the exact moment their smile stopped reaching their eyes—the moment the <strong>"breach of contract"</strong> actually occurred.</sub></p><p><sub><br/></sub></p><p><sub>In Law, we are taught that <strong>“he who asserts must prove.”</strong> I assert that I was loved. I assert that we had a <strong>"Memorandum of Understanding"</strong> regarding our future. I assert to his words of affirmation. </sub></p><p><sub>But when I look for the signed documents, I find only fading reels and a half-finished book on my nightstand that they promised to read.</sub></p><p><sub><br/></sub></p><p><sub>There is a specific kind of<strong> "Rock Bottom" </strong>that happens when your logical brain meets your breaking heart. My legal mind wants to file an injunction against the memories. It wants to strike out the "he-said-she-said" of our final argument. It wants a clean verdict: Guilty or Not Guilty.</sub></p><p><sub><br/></sub></p><p><sub>But the heart isn't a courtroom; it’s a crime scene that never gets taped off.</sub></p><p><sub><br/></sub></p><p><sub>There is no judge to gavel down the noise in my head. There is no <strong>bailiff</strong> to escort the grief out of the room. There is only the<strong> "Evidence of Absence"</strong>—the way the seat next to me in the library feels heavier now that it’s empty.</sub></p><p><sub><br/></sub></p><p><sub>I am realizing that the most difficult <strong>"trial" </strong>of my youth isn't the Bar Exam. It’s the moment I have to stand up, look at the empty witness box where they used to be, and deliver the final judgment myself:</sub></p><p><sub><br/></sub></p><p><sub>Case dismissed. For lack of interest. For prevention of a worse heartbreak. For the sake of my own peace- I'd let this case go. I hope my next case doesn't land me in a court room judging between two opinions. </sub></p><p><sub><img src="/media/inline_insight_image/Screenshot_20260307-180414.jpg"/></sub></p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month.
The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments