<p>The List</p><p></p><p>The letter arrived on a humid Tuesday morning, its edges crisp despite the Lagos heat. Amara Okeke, 23, tore it open with the casual confidence of a first-class graduate expecting her NYSC call-up. Instead, her eyes scanned words that felt like a punch to the gut: Accused of exam malpractice. Blacklisted from the National Youth Service Corps. Her name, her signature, was on a list of culprits submitted to the university senate. But Amara had never cheated. Not once.</p><p>She sat on the edge of her bed in her cramped off-campus apartment, the letter trembling in her hands. Her phone buzzed—her mother, probably calling to celebrate her posting. Amara ignored it. Her future—law school, a career at a top firm—was slipping away. She had one month before the NYSC camp closed registrations. One month to clear her name.</p><p>Amara started at the university’s exam office. The clerk, a wiry man with a permanent scowl, barely looked up from his ledger. “Your name’s on the list. Senate doesn’t make mistakes,” he said, waving her off. But Amara caught a flicker in his eyes—nervousness, maybe. She pressed, “Who submitted the list?” He shrugged. “Anonymous tip. Evidence was airtight.”</p><p>Back in her room, she pored over the letter again. The signature was hers, down to the sharp loop of the A. A forgery, but a good one. She needed to know who had access to her records. Her first suspect was Chidi, her course rival. He’d always resented her topping the class, his smug grin faltering every time she outscored him. But Chidi was lazy, not cunning. Forging a signature and framing her seemed beyond him.</p><p>She visited the faculty server room next, where exam records were digitized. The IT guy, Tunde, was a friend from her coding club days. Over a bottle of Malt, he agreed to poke around—off the books. “Someone accessed the exam database three months ago,” he whispered, glancing over his shoulder. “They downloaded your answer sheet and signature scan. IP address was masked, but it came from the library.”</p><p>The library. Amara’s stomach churned. She’d spent hours there, her laptop open, her notes scattered. Someone could’ve watched her, maybe even hacked her device. She remembered Kemi, the quiet girl from her study group, always lingering, always asking to borrow her notes. Kemi worked part-time at the library, didn’t she?</p><p>Amara confronted Kemi at the library’s back entrance, where she was sneaking a cigarette. “Why’d you do it?” Amara asked, voice low but firm. Kemi’s eyes widened, but she recovered fast, flicking ash. “Do what? You’re paranoid.”</p><p>“I know someone used a library computer to frame me. You had access, Kemi. And you’ve been weirdly nice lately.” Amara stepped closer. “What’s in it for you?”</p><p>Kemi’s cool facade cracked. “You think you’re so perfect, Amara. First-class, golden girl. Some people don’t get breaks like you.” Her voice dripped with bitterness. “I didn’t forge anything. But yeah, I heard rumors. Someone paid big money to make sure you didn’t graduate clean.”</p><p>“Who?” Amara grabbed Kemi’s arm, not caring about the stares from passing students.</p><p>Kemi yanked free. “Ask your precious professor.”</p><p>Professor Adebayo, Amara’s project supervisor, was the last person she’d suspect. He’d mentored her, written glowing recommendation letters. But Kemi’s words gnawed at her. She found him in his office, grading papers. “Amara,” he said warmly, then faltered at her expression. “What’s wrong?”</p><p>“Someone forged my signature to blacklist me from NYSC. Was it you?” Her voice shook, but she held his gaze.</p><p>His face crumpled, not with guilt but with pity. “Amara, I’d never. But…” He hesitated, then pulled a folder from his drawer. “Two months ago, someone offered me money to alter your records. I refused. They must’ve gone another route.”</p><p>“Who was it?” she demanded.</p><p>He sighed. “Dr. Nwosu. He’s on the senate committee. I didn’t report him because I had no proof.”</p><p>Dr. Nwosu, the stern head of the exam board, had always seemed untouchable. Amara didn’t confront him directly—she knew better. Instead, she enlisted Tunde again. They set up a sting: Tunde sent an encrypted email from a dummy account, posing as the anonymous tipster, claiming to have more “evidence” to sell. Nwosu took the bait, agreeing to meet at a quiet café off-campus.</p><p>Amara hid nearby, recording everything. Nwosu arrived, nervous, clutching a briefcase. When Tunde pressed for why he’d targeted Amara, Nwosu snapped, “Her father’s company outbid mine for a government contract. She was collateral damage.”</p><p>Amara’s heart sank. Her father, a small-time contractor, had no idea his business deals could ruin her. She stepped out, phone still recording. “It’s over, Dr. Nwosu.”</p><p>His face paled. “You don’t understand the stakes, girl.”</p><p>“I understand enough,” she said, uploading the video to the cloud for safekeeping.</p><p>The next week was a blur. Amara presented the recording to the vice-chancellor, who launched an investigation. Nwosu was suspended, the blacklist overturned. Her NYSC call-up arrived just in time. As she packed for camp, her phone buzzed—her father, apologetic, promising to be more careful.</p><p>Amara smiled faintly. She’d cleared her name, but the betrayal lingered. Trust was a luxury she couldn’t afford anymore. At camp, she’d keep her eyes open. The list was gone, but the game wasn’t over.</p><p></p><p></p>
The list
ByEmilia's Pen•5 plays
0:00 /
0:00
|
Thank you for reading. If you will like to see more of my work, consider leaving a tip to encourage me ♡
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments