<p>The recent cold banter between Engineering and Medical students has been genuinely entertaining to watch, and I'll admit, it's stirred up a bit of envy on my end for the engineering side.</p><p><br/></p><p>Back in A-Levels, I got a taste of electronic circuits, basic kinematics, and thermodynamics, and I couldn't help but wonder how applicable these concepts really were outside the classroom. Turns out: very.</p><p><br/></p><p>The biological sciences, by contrast, can feel more abstract in daily conversation. More often than not, you find yourself explaining a concept without much depth, because the depth is buried under years of study, not something you can casually sketch out. An engineering student, on the other hand, could probably rough out a paragraph on how the heart or brain functions and get the gist right. But try handing a consultant professor of medicine a Kirchhoff's voltage and current law problem, loop rules, junction rules, the works. Maybe they'd take a swing at it. Most likely, they wouldn't.</p><p><br/></p><p>That asymmetry says something. In my honest opinion, medicine wouldn't have gotten nearly as far without engineering's input, from the electronics behind ECGs and MRI machines to the fluid dynamics that inform how we understand blood flow. Engineering doesn't just support medicine from the outside; it's woven into how modern medicine actually works.</p><p><br/></p><p>So maybe the banter is playful, but the underlying point isn't entirely a joke.</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month.
The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.