<p>"Dependency Vector" is a technical term, but at its core, it means something very simple: a metric used to define how heavily one thing relies on another.<br/><br/>How does this relate to AI?<br/><br/>Imagine you want to write a short article about peaches. Rather than doing your own research, reading up on the fruit, and organizing your thoughts, you go to your favorite AI tool. You type: "Write an article of 450 words on the health benefits of peaches."<br/><br/>And <em>voila</em>—you have it.<br/><br/>Look at what just happened there. No brain work. No rough draft. Just prompted into existence.<br/><br/>But what happens if we consistently delegate our cognitive abilities to a machine? We are already seeing the early signs. How many people can still do mental math? How many can write a simple essay or an email without first prompting an AI, and then just tweaking the result?<br/>Bypassing the Struggle<br/><br/>I feel a deep sense of worry for children growing up right now. It is a known scientific fact that the human brain needs challenges to grow and strengthen. Suddenly, those mental challenges are being cleared out of the way. Kids are being spoon-fed results rather than being left to ponder hard problems.<br/><br/> In our frantic bid to become advanced, we are at risk of becoming obsolete.<br/><br/>The entry-level skills that young workers usually build upon to grow their careers are being replaced by algorithms, overseen by a select few. If we look ten years into the future, the only question we might be asking people is, "How good are you at using AI systems?"<br/><br/></p><p><strong>The Fine Print</strong></p><p><br/>But right now, there is something incredibly telling written in small letters at the bottom of almost every chatbot window. It’s a disclaimer stating: AI makes mistakes.<br/><br/>If we completely lose our ability to research, think, and verify, how will we ever notice those mistakes?<br/><br/>We need to take practical steps right now to safeguard ourselves and our children from corroding our mental fortitude. Serve a draft; don’t just prompt all the time. Let’s stop children from relying on AI at the exact age they should be tackling their own problems, fighting through confusion, and learning to sit with the restlessness of finding an answer on their own.</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month.
The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments