<p>There's that disconcerting feeling most of us have experienced at some point, either firsthand or through someone else. The next person might be doing better, or just is better than how we see ourselves, and that creates a false belief. You hear statements like she's better than me or he's better than me. Those thoughts are poisonous and once entertained have a strong likelihood of staying.<br/><br/>This isn't about self-discovery or how to get out of it. It's more of a question: why do people assume that their entirety is less than another person's?<br/><br/>Take bullying. It's a proven psychological track that bullying stems from envy, ironic right, that the one inflicting the pain is envious of the victim.<br/><br/>Social media isn't helping, it's aggravating it. We have all these dopamine drivers and scrolling mechanisms showing us the lives of people. And it's become a thing where people genuinely believe that whoever they see is doing better. Not in one area. Just better. The scroll becomes a verdict.<br/><br/>Most people have one thing or another they're uncomfortable about and seeing someone excel in that area creates that feeling of inadequacy.<br/><br/>It doesn't stop at lifestyle and appearance though. The next comparison is money, who has more, who's further ahead. That one carries weight because it feels measurable, like there's a scoreboard somewhere and you've seen where your name sits.<br/><br/>But the most diabolical comparison is the one that reaches your principles. When you start questioning not what you have but who you are. When someone else's choices make you doubt your own values, the code you've lived by. That's no longer comparison. That's erosion.<br/><br/>We grow up in different environments and circumstances and those things influence us more than we can imagine. Our identities are slowly corroding in this global landscape because the next person seems better and we want to be them. Forgetting that we borrow from one, then another, sanding down the edges of ourselves trying to become a composite of everyone we've decided is more.<br/><br/>Have we ever stopped to actually look at the people we think are better and ask what makes us less? Not as a defence. As a real question. Because the honest answer most of the time is nothing. A different path. A different timeline. A different set of circumstances. Not less.<br/><br/>A world where we all believe the next person is better is a world where no one is.</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month.
The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments