<p>There is something strange about human beings.</p><p>We hate corruption until we are the ones benefiting from it.</p><p>We hate injustice until it works in our favour.</p><p>We hate people who abuse power until we are given power of our own.</p><p>Then suddenly, everything has an explanation.</p><p>“He had no choice.”</p><p>“She was under pressure.”</p><p>“It was just a mistake.”</p><p>“We don't know what he was going through.”</p><p>Funny enough, we rarely give these explanations to the people we judge.</p><p>We see the action, but we don't see the pressure behind it.</p><p>We see the decision, but we don't see the position that produced it.</p><p>And perhaps that is because it is easier to judge someone from where we are standing than to imagine ourselves standing where they stood.</p><p>A manager punishes an employee too harshly, and we call him wicked.</p><p>A politician steals public money, and we call him corrupt.</p><p>A person uses their position for personal gain, and we question their character.</p><p>But sometimes I wonder...</p><p>If the same opportunity was placed in our hands, would we still be the people we claim to be?</p><p>Maybe you would.</p><p>Maybe you wouldn't.</p><p>This doesn't mean we should excuse wrongdoing.</p><p>You may still disagree with their decision.</p><p>You may still believe they were wrong.</p><p><br/></p><p>But there is only one way to know for certain, and life rarely gives us a warning before it tests us.</p><p>So before you condemn the person standing on the other side of the mirror, ask yourself:</p><p>What If it was you, would you have done any better?</p><p><br/></p><p>By EDDER</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month.
The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.