<p>Tony is in his room. His fingers full of crums from cream crackers, his phone propped at an angle that says he has nowhere urgent to be. An Instagram reel is playing — the history of the Benin Kingdom, narrated over sweeping visuals, confident and fast. He is interested. More than interested. He is leaning in.</p><p>This is what knowledge looks like in 2026. Not always a lamp-lit desk and a cracked spine. Sometimes it is a young man in a room, mid-snack, stumbling into a civilisation through a sixty-second scroll.</p><p><br/></p><p><strong>But then</strong> Tony reaches the comment section.</p><p><em style="background-color: transparent;">That date is wrong. The British didn't arrive then. This part is exaggerated. </em></p><p><br/></p><p>The corrections stack up quietly beneath the reel's confidence. And Tony, to his credit, does not look away. He reads every one. He grows confused — not the dull confusion of someone who has lost interest, but the sharp, restless confusion of someone who suddenly understands that there is far more to know.</p><p><span style="background-color: transparent;">Then a comment stops him mid scroll -If you want to understand the real history of Benin, read this book.</span></p><p>He grasps the title. He searches it. He orders it.</p><p>As he prepares to go all in.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p><strong>Has social media replaced books as the real driver of knowledge and influence?</strong> It is a question asked with urgency, as though one must lose for the other to win. As though Tony has to choose between the reel and the book.</p><p>He doesn't. And neither do we.</p><p><br/></p><p><em>Social media is the spark. Books are the fire. One creates the appetite. The other feeds it.</em></p><p><br/></p><p>What Tony encountered on Instagram was real — genuine curiosity, ignited in an ordinary moment. Social media does that. It finds people who never thought history was for them, and makes ideas travel at a speed no printing press ever could. In Nigeria, where knowledge has always moved through voice and story and shared space, the reel is not foreign. It is familiar. It is the village square, rebuilt on a server somewhere and placed in everyone's pocket.</p><p>But the reel could not hold what Tony needed. The history of the Benin Kingdom is not a sixty-second story. It is language, culture, architecture and diplomacy .Two minutes cannot carry that weight. A comment section cannot settle it. </p><p><em>Influence that only skims the surface is not really influence.</em></p><p><br/></p><p>Most people would have kept scrolling. They would have carried a half-truth about Benin for years, confident enough to repeat it, unaware of what they'd missed. And this is the quiet crisis beneath the debate — not that social media is bad, but that it rewards stopping early.</p><p><br/></p><p>Tony did not stop. He felt the insufficiency . He needed to understand — not just know. There is a difference, and books are where that difference lives.</p><p><br/></p><p>To go all in, in Nigeria, in 2026, is to refuse the flatness. It is to treat social media as a signal — a finger pointing — and books as the anchor that holds your understanding steady when the current of the feed tries to pull you somewhere else. It is to use action as evidence: not just consuming knowledge, but doing something with the depth you've found. Passing the book across the room. Sending the title to a friend. Building something from what you learned.</p><p><br/></p><p>The reel brought Tony to the door. The book will take him through it.</p><p>Social media has not replaced books. It has, in its strange and chaotic way, made the hunger for them(books) more visible.</p><p><br/></p><p>Go all in. Not on one or the other. On the curiosity that refuses to be satisfied by sixty seconds. On the version of yourself that reaches for the book when the reel is done.</p><p>That is where knowledge lives. That <span style="background-color: transparent;">is where influence begins.</span></p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments