I would like to believe that social media was created to bolster and improve communication and interaction amongst ourselves. And part of communication entails acknowledging different opinions and ensuring a cordial coexistence. This cordial existence is irrespective of whether or not we agree with the opinions of others.
It is however, not the case. While social media should encourage respectful conversations, it is rather an avenue for shutting people down and mob mentality. Having a different opinion from the general one, is an extreme sport these days. There is always someone waiting to tear your head off. I only recently decided to start dripping my opinions on issues, and damning the consequences.
You would think, one of the advantages of social media is the opportunity to learn and experience different ideologies. Why then should opinions be shut down or be shoved on others. The funny thing is, for an opinion to be valid, it has to be the one accepted by the majority. And God help you, if you say anything contrary - even if the majority could be wrong.
Another thing about communication and conversation is that; nobody knows everything. We communicate to fill in the gaps in our own knowledge. We have better understanding of somethings through conversations. Why then is it different on social media? Mistakes and ignorance are unpardonable. There is always an angry community, ready to shit on people for making genuine mistakes. We constantly have to work on cyber eggshells or face the risk of being labelled: racist, sexist, homophobic, tribalistic, or be cancelled (for the public figures)
The truth is the actual reality of social media can be exhausting and worrisome. I often wonder if the world might have been better without it after all.
Social media (in)tolerance?
ByJefferson Nnadiekwe•3 plays
0:00 /
0:00
|
I know you like my insights đ. Kindly consider leaving a tip.
At the end of each month, we give out cash prizes to 5 people with the best insights in the past month
as well as coupon points to 15 people who didn't make the top 5, but shared high-quality content.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate contentâuse it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio contentâhigh-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover imagesâif your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments