<h2><strong>That N10bn Solar Power Budget</strong></h2><p></p><p>Twocent News flash </p><p>That N10bn Solar Power Budget</p><p>There are reports that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has approved a princely sum of N10 billion for a solar power system exclusively for Aso Rock Villa, the seat of the Presidency. Previously, the alternative power source for the Villa has been diesel-powered generators.</p><p><img src="/media/inline_insight_image/images (40).jpeg" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: "Helvetica Neue", Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;" alt=""></p><p></p><p>The project is expected to reduce dependence on the national grid and cut energy costs for the State House, especially considering that the Abuja Electricity Distribution Company (AEDC) listed the Presidential Villa among top government debtors, with an outstanding bill of N923.87 million in February 2024. GovSpend, a public finance tracking platform, claimed that the presidency spent more than N483 million on electricity in 2024 alone.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nigerians are familiar with the cost of petroleum products in this regard and may be inclined to support the government’s move, presumably as a cost-saving device. The worry is that the authorities seem to be concerned only about their convenience without considering the plight of ordinary Nigerians who, due to the inefficiency of the public power supply system, are forced to bear the burden of official incompetence and failures.</p><p></p><p></p><p>“White House Enjoys It Too,” Presidency Defends N10bn Solar Power Project For Aso Rock Villa</p><p></p><p>Experts are already raising concerns regarding the implications of the government’s decision to single out the Villa for this preferential treatment. If the Presidency cannot trust the national power supply, what hope is left for the average Nigerian business or household? And is this the beginning of a systemic reform? Or can this mark the cementing of elite energy privilege?</p><p></p><p>Power sector watchers are worried that this gargantuan budgetary provision could be misinterpreted as the President’s removal of Aso Rock Villa from the national electricity grid. Or perhaps he plans to dismantle the public power system altogether through this obvious vote of no confidence in the country’s ill-managed national grid? We note also that some high-profile businesses have already disconnected from the national grid.</p><p></p><p></p><p>These issues become pungent considering the cost and availability of solar as an electric power source. Is it part of the President’s plan to encourage Nigerians to follow his lead and replicate the CNG policy in the transport sector in the public electricity sector? In our opinion, it is important that the government comes out openly and tells Nigerians what to expect from this seemingly shift in energy policy.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It is pertinent to point out that not many Nigerians can afford the cost of installing solar systems in their homes and offices, while accommodating the high tariff from the electricity distributing companies for services not rendered.</p><p></p><p>We are even more surprised that President Tinubu is involved in this decision, which could be interpreted as rationalising the inequities in the country’s socio-economic and political space, where the emphasis is on the welfare of the elite. We recall that under the Presidency of Olusegun Obasanjo, Tinubu, as Governor of Lagos state, persuaded the late Chief Bola Ige to choose the Ministry of Power instead of the Attorney General of the Federation, which Ige would have preferred. That was perceived then as evidence that he appreciated the relevance of electricity in the country’s economic development and was determined to do what was necessary to achieve the same for the common good.</p><p></p><p></p><p>We also recall that in one of his political outings, Tinubu told Nigerians not to vote for him again if he failed to provide reliable and affordable electric power to them. It was meant to demonstrate his commitment to making electricity available at a reasonable cost. Nigerians might take him seriously and possibly hold him by his words. But in setting aside this huge financial outlay for power supply to the Villa, the President is stating clearly that he has lost confidence in the public power grid and, by extension, the generating and distributing companies that have held the nation hostage since the unbundling of Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN).</p><p></p><p>It may also indicate an admission of policy failure in the power sector. To date, the debate is still on about the exact amount spent by the Olusegun Obasanjo administration on the Independent Power policy through the National Integrated Power Projects (NIPP). Protagonists and antagonists in that shameful debate quibble over $16 billion. In addition, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) under Godwin Emefiele allegedly spent over N1.5 trillion in seven years to keep the nation’s power sector from collapsing. After all these expenditures that are beginning to look like wastages, the government is pointing in the direction of green energy that solar represents.</p><p></p><p>It is necessary to stress that, given the impact of climate change, Nigerians ought to applaud a policy shift towards clean energy—that is, if there is such a policy. As a newspaper, we are apprehensive that the state governments may follow the Presidency’s example. The cost implications of this, when it happens, can only be imagined, especially when corruption is brought into it.</p><p></p><p>From this standpoint, we urge the federal government to make clear what its intentions are regarding electricity supply to the people. Pandering selectively to the convenience of those in government and political power will be ill-advised and counterproductive. Nigerians across the social spectrum deserve access to the same facilities available to the people they elected to represent them and serve their interests.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments