Things I Learned from the First Chapter of Atomic Habits Part One
<p>I decided to read Atomic Habits by James Clear because I needed help staying consistent with my goals and daily habits.</p><p><strong>Chapter One: The Surprising Power of Atomic Habits</strong></p><p>The first chapter started with a story of the British cycling team and how mediocre they had been for over 100 years of their existence until they hired Dave Brailsford as their performance director, leading to one of the most successful runs in cycling history. what did he do differently? He focused on improving every aspect of cycling by just one percent. He called this approach the ‘aggregation of marginal gains’, the idea of seeking tiny improvements in everything you do. Clear illustrates this with an analogy: if you improve by one percent every day for a year, you’ll end up 37 times better by the end of that year.</p><p>He discussed how often we overestimate the importance of one defining moment and underestimating the value of making small improvement on a daily basics. He explained, ‘making a choice that is 1% better or worse seems insignificant in the moment, but in the long run determines who you are and who you could be’. He emphasized that we shouldn’t really be worried about our current condition, but if our current habits are leading us to where we want to be, As he put it ‘It’s more important to focus on your current trajectory than your current results’.</p><p>Another concept Clear discussed was the Plateau of Latent Potential. He explained that change is not linear but exponential. The results of our efforts are often delayed, and this phase is referred to as the Valley of Disappointment. It’s during this stage that people often feel discouraged after putting in weeks or months of hard work without seeing immediate results. However, the truth is that the effort is not wasted. It’s being stored, laying the groundwork for future success.</p><p>Thanks for reading! I’ll be sharing part two of this write up soon. I hope we all grow and become the best versions of ourselves. Please like and share your thoughts in the comments!.</p>
At the end of each month, we give out cash prizes to 5 people with the best insights in the past month
as well as coupon points to 15 people who didn't make the top 5, but shared high-quality content.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments