Nursery school to secondary school. That's where students learn how to read and write, which is the foundation of everything. As long as they've got that down, I think they're good to go.
Now, don't get me wrong - I'm not trying to downplay the importance of higher institutions. But if we're being logical, universities should be focusing on teaching students how to navigate life, not just academics. I mean, think about it - university is like a crash course in adulthood. It's where you're thrown into a melting pot of different people, cultures, and lifestyles.
Imagine being surrounded by individuals from diverse backgrounds, each with their unique perspectives and experiences. It's an incredible opportunity to learn from others, challenge your own biases, and develop empathy. But are universities truly leveraging this potential?
That's why I think universities should start by teaching students how to deal with life on campus. It's not just about academics; it's about learning how to interact with people, manage conflicts, and build meaningful relationships. They should be teaching students how to be adults, not just how to pass exams.
What if universities offered courses on emotional intelligence, conflict resolution, and mental health? What if they provided workshops on networking, time management, and financial literacy? These are the skills that will truly prepare students for success in the real world.
I'm not saying I've got all the answers, and I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. But to me, it makes sense that universities should be focusing on teaching students how to live, not just how to learn.
Here are some thought-provoking questions:
- What if universities prioritized student well-being and mental health alongside academic achievement?
- How can universities foster a sense of community and belonging among students from diverse backgrounds?
- What role should universities play in preparing students for the complexities of the modern world, including issues like climate change, social inequality, and technological disruption?
Let's continue the conversation!
At the end of each month, we give out cash prizes to 5 people with the best insights in the past month
as well as coupon points to 15 people who didn't make the top 5, but shared high-quality content.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments