<blockquote>There is a quiet kind of imprisonment that doesn’t look like suffering from the outside. It looks like being agreeable. Smiling on cue. Adjusting your opinions so the room stays comfortable. For a long time, I thought this was maturity—learning how to fit in, how not to offend, how to be liked. I didn’t realize that every time I edited myself for approval, I was tightening the bars around my own voice.</blockquote><p>Seeking validation slowly teaches you to outsource your worth. You begin to measure yourself by reactions—who claps, who approves, who cares, who stays. And without noticing, you start living for responses instead of truth. People pleasing doesn’t just change how others see you; it reshapes how you see yourself. You become cautious where you should be honest, small where you should take up space. </p><p>I thought I was kind but I was actually a people pleaser. How did I find out? I always felt some sort of indignation against myself when I rendered a service or whenever something happened and I resolved to shutting up to maintain peace and rather hurt inside than speak out. I didn't know how to say no because i never wanted to offend. I would stay calm, smile nervously and agree with everything they said just to fit in. But on the other hand, they didn't find it hard to condemn or use demeaning words. More like they didn't care if they hurt someone with their words. I lived through a childhood trauma that I tried so hard to heal from. It was about my appearance. Somebody made a nasty comment on my appearance and it shattered my ego. I felt bad but I couldn't speak up to say I wasn't okay with that. I just smiled🥲For the meantime, it worked but I found out these people didn't like me. They didn't have my interest at heart; they loved how I crushed myself just to satisfy and give them an upper hand. </p><p>The problem?</p><p>When you try to speak out or lose yourself from their hold they assume you changed. I told myself I had to change. All the whole time it seemed I lived for the world...when was I ever going to live for myself? When would I do things I enjoyed without caring what anyone thought? When would I ever get to stand and say confidently what I wanted and not feel bad for asking?</p><p>One day, it dawned on me. I had to break free from this cage. The humiliation was too much. I started by saying 'no' to what I was not okay with. I would dress up and not feel bad about how I looked. Unlike me who would scan people's faces waiting for a facial expression that validates my looks. I learnt I can be kind and not nice. I learnt I can be good to people when needed. I learnt it's my world and people living in it. </p><p>The moment approval becomes a cage is the moment you realize you are exhausted from performing a version of yourself that was never meant to last. Freedom doesn’t come from being liked by everyone—it comes from finally allowing yourself to exist without permission.</p><p>I am finally free, you can as well!!!</p>
|
Please send me tips to encourage me to write better🙏🌝
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to 7 people with the best insights in the past month. The 7 winners are picked
by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
All-time Contributors
All-time Engagers
Top Monthly Contributors
Top Monthly Engagers
Most Active Colleges
Contributor Score
The all-time ranking is based on users' Contributor Score, which is a measure of all
the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
Subscriptions received
2
Tips received
3
Comments (excluding replies)
4
Upvotes
5
Views
6
Number of insights published
Engagement Score
The All-time Engagers ranking is based on a user's Engagement Score — a measure of how much a
user engages with other users' content via comments and upvotes.
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate the Engagement Score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
1
A user's comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's upvotes
Monthly Score
The Top Monthly Contributors ranking is a monthly metric indicating how users respond to your posts, not just how many you publish.
We look at three main things:
1
How strong your best post is —
Your highest-scoring post this month carries the most weight. One great post can take you far.
2
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
We also look at the average score of all your posts. If your work keeps getting good reactions, you get a boost.
3
How consistent the engagement you receive is —
Posting more helps — but only a little.
Extra posts give a small bonus that grows slowly, so quality always matters more than quantity.
In simple terms:
A great post beats many ignored posts
Consistently engaging posts beat one lucky hit
Spamming low-engagement posts won't help
Tips, comments, and upvotes from others matter most
This ranking is designed to reward
Thoughtful, high-quality posts
Real engagement from the community
Consistency over time — without punishing you for posting again
The Top Monthly Contributors leaderboard reflects what truly resonates, not just who posts the most.
Top Monthly Engagers
The Top Monthly Engagers ranking tracks the most active engagers on a monthly basis
Here is what we look at
1
A user's monthly comments (excluding replies & said user's comments on their own content)
2
A user's monthly upvotes
Most Active Colleges
The Most Active Colleges ranking is a list of the most active contributors on TwoCents, grouped by the
colleges/universities they attend(ed)
Here is what we look at
1
All insights posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels)
2
All comments posted by contributors that attended a particular school (at both undergraduate or postgraduate levels) —
excluding replies
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments