Five stances. Choose where you stand, then join the conversation.
We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month. The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality and insightfulness of their content.
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month. We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Content Contributor
Eligible to Earn
Most Viewed in a Space
Monthly Prize Winner
Mini-Competition/Flash Contest Winner
Essay Competition Winner
Spoken Word Competition Winner
Hundred Insight Club (HIC) (100+ Insights)
Contributor (500+ Score)
Top Contributor (2000+ Score)
Elite Contributor (5000+ Score)
Trusted Contributor
Five stances. Choose where you stand, then join the conversation.
2 Replies
wait oh, are we now focusing more on the word “people” than the actual point?
I agree it’s not everybody, but if a good number of people only hate corruption when they’re not benefiting from it, doesn’t that still prove the point?
Some ppl oppose corruption mainly when they are excluded from its benefits, this one is a real phenomenon. A lot of us are guilty. Pepper body go begin do some ppl the moment someone else is allowed to pass one way (for example) and they can’t. Allow them pass, and they won’t complain. The 2nd claim is that ppl generally don’t oppose corruption; they only resent not benefiting from it. This one is the one that’s harder to defend.