I must have thought about it a couple of times, I think a few stans have argued about it a few times as well. I am talking about just how good Buju BNXN is outside hit features, in comparison to his solo singles. It is no surprise that Buju has one of the best and unique voices in the Nigerian music industry but a lot of opinions have been thrown around that he does not have as much solo hit tracks as his features. Well, who better to blow it put of proportion than a fellow artiste?
Jonzing world artiste, Ruger, has been going at it on Twitter with Buju, regarding who is a better musician, has more streams and just the overall best between them. I think there is a certain level of unspoken competition between the new emerging musicians in the industry and it seems a few of Don Jazzy's signees in a few of these squabbles.
We have seen one of the Mavin signees, Magixx go on a Twitter spree, shading other new artistes. In fact, another new Mavin artiste, Boy Spyce may have just blocked a good number of his social media followers due to comparisons and "lack of appreciation" for his sound in the industry.
Amidst the chaos, favorite Nigerian rapper Blaqbonez may have just shed some light on something a lot of Nigerians may not understand about the industry; the use of underground music streaming farms. I will make this simple- streaming farms are illegal setups that help artistes stream their music, boosting the number of streams on a track or album. the ideal conspiracy is, most streams seen on music streaming platforms are bot generated, not organic. 3 million views in 3 hours; weldone Boss.
Anyway, let us not take away the fact that most of these comparisons are stirred up by the fans. I really do not know what joy people get in comparison, can't we all just get along?
At the end of each month, we give out cash prizes to 5 people with the best insights in the past month
as well as coupon points to 15 people who didn't make the top 5, but shared high-quality content.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Contributor Rankings
The Contributor Rankings shows the Top 20 Contributors on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis.
The all-time ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly score sums the score on all your insights in the past 30 days. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on TwoCents — these are community members that have engaged the most with other user's content.
Contributor Score
Here is a list of metrics that are used to calcuate your contributor score, arranged from
the metric with the highest weighting, to the one with the lowest weighting.
4
Comments (excluding replies)
5
Upvotes
6
Views
1
Number of insights published
2
Subscriptions received
3
Tips received
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments