We Dropped Maths for Arts Students. What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

When I first came across yesterday’s announcement that mathematics would no longer be compulsory for students in the Arts and Humanities, I thought it was a joke. Not because the Nigerian government is incapable of surprising reforms, but because the logic felt upside down. How can a nation already struggling with weak numeracy and shallow reasoning imagine that removing mathematics will make things better? Someone once remarked that many Nigerians can’t accurately visualize what three feet, three kilometres, or one billion naira really mean — and now we’re removing maths for a third of our senior secondary students? Why such a policy shift? According to the Federal Ministry of Education, the aim is to remove unnecessary barriers to higher education. Every year, millions take the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination, yet less than half get admitted. The Ministry claims that one major obstacle is mathematics, and by relaxing that rule, they hope to promote inclusivity and fairness. At first glance, it sounds reasonable. Education should indeed be inclusive. No one should miss university because they struggle with trigonometry or quadratic equations. But inclusion without structure is chaos dressed as compassion. The goal of education isn’t just to open doors — it’s to ensure that those who walk through them can think critically once inside. Mathematics isn’t only for mathematicians. It teaches logic, precision, patience, and clarity. It sharpens how we reason, detect patterns, and verify truth. Balancing equations isn’t just an academic exercise — it’s a quiet lesson in balancing life’s uncertainties. Taking mathematics away from artists or writers is like removing rhythm from music: you lose discipline and structure. This confusion isn’t new. Many people think mathematics is merely about numbers and formulas, forgetting it’s also a language of reasoning. The ancient Greeks knew this well. Plato’s Academy famously bore the inscription: *“Let no one ignorant of geometry enter here.”* He understood that geometry trained the mind to think clearly — a foundation for philosophy, politics, and art. Centuries later, the European Renaissance was driven not only by creative geniuses like Leonardo da Vinci (a trained mathematician, by the way) but also by figures like Fibonacci, whose ideas shaped art, architecture, and design. The arts and mathematics have always been partners. Mathematics is equally essential to Nigeria’s creative ecosystem. A musician calculating Spotify royalties needs percentages and metrics. A Nollywood producer must understand budgets and profit margins. A journalist analyzing inflation data needs basic statistical literacy. Even a poet publishing online has to interpret engagement numbers and digital royalties. Mathematics doesn’t belong only in laboratories — it belongs in every thinking profession. Professor Chike Obi, Nigeria’s first mathematics PhD, once said that a nation’s progress depends on how well it teaches maths. He warned that societies which treat it as optional eventually dull their intellectual edge. Decades later, his words ring truer than ever. Supporters of the new policy argue that rigid entry requirements are blocking access to higher education, and that this change promotes fairness. But the question isn’t whether the gates should open wider — it’s whether the students entering are prepared to think. The real problem isn’t mathematics itself, but how it’s taught. Poor instruction has made it abstract and lifeless, reducing it to memorized formulas rather than practical understanding. The failure is in teaching, not in the subject. Instead of reforming the foundation, we’re dismantling it. Elsewhere, the global trend is the opposite. Finland integrates mathematics into creative learning. Singapore embeds it deeply in its curriculum. These nations understand that critical thinking thrives on both creativity and logic. Nigeria, however, seems intent on separating them. Some people point to the UK, saying students can drop maths after age 16. But let’s be honest — have you checked global education rankings lately? Shouldn’t we learn from Finland, South Korea, and the Netherlands — countries that top those lists — rather than copy what’s clearly not working? The consequences will be real. Employers already complain that many graduates struggle with logical reasoning. They can speak eloquently but cannot analyse data, interpret charts, or solve open-ended problems. These aren’t signs of low intelligence, but of weak structure. Removing mathematics will only weaken that structure further. Ironically, mathematics already lives at the core of art and culture. Music follows ratios, literature depends on logic, architecture thrives on symmetry, and even politics relies on data and probability. To dismiss mathematics as irrelevant to the arts is to deny the patterns that give creativity its form. This new policy reflects a deeper Nigerian habit — our craving for shortcuts. When faced with difficulty, we often choose the easiest exit. But progress doesn’t come from lowering standards; it comes from strengthening minds. A country that stops training its citizens to think rigorously will eventually depend on others to do the thinking. Yes, thousands of students fail maths each year and lose admission opportunities. That’s painful. But the solution isn’t to abolish the subject; it’s to make it relatable, practical, and better taught. Imagine the impact if the government focused instead on retraining teachers, updating materials, and connecting lessons to real-life situations. That would make education fairer *and* stronger. The Ministry claims the reform could add 300,000 new university admissions annually. But entry isn’t the same as education. If students gain admission without developing reasoning skills, they graduate without them too. Expansion without depth produces quantity, not quality. This decision could also deepen inequality. Wealthier families will still ensure their children learn mathematics privately, equipping them to compete globally, while poorer students are told they don’t need it. Over time, the divide won’t just be financial — it’ll be intellectual. There’s still time to rethink. Government should consult students, teachers, parents, and employers, and separate true inclusion from misplaced pity. The goal shouldn’t be to remove mathematics, but to make it meaningful. History shows that every nation that neglected mathematical reasoning eventually paid the price in innovation and competitiveness. UNESCO’s 2023 report lists numeracy and data reasoning among the top ten skills employers seek worldwide. The World Economic Forum’s *Future of Jobs Report* highlights “analytical thinking” and “quantitative reasoning” as essential across all careers. Removing mathematics may open one door today, but it will close many more tomorrow. When young people lose the habit of structured thought, they lose the ability to build lasting things. And no society has ever prospered by making it easier to think less.

Other insights from Bigdan

Referral Earning

Points-to-Coupons