The High Court of Uganda has clarified the Jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal on Determination and Apportionment of Costs in Ugandan.
<p>The High Court of Uganda in Misc. App. No. 05 of 2025 Roko Construction Limited versus Pearl Marina Estates Limited confirmed that under Ugandan Arbitration Law, the Arbitrator Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction to determine and apportion the costs and expenses of an arbitration, being the legal and other expenses of the parties, the fees and expenses of the arbitral tribunal and any other expenses related to the arbitration. This includes deciding who of the parties is liable for costs, the reasons why and to what extent, i.e. undertaking a mathematical calculation of the costs obligation. <br/><br/>The effect is that the apportionment is not completed until the Arbitrator has quantified the costs. To that end, the Arbitrator must request the parties to submit on the determination and apportionment of costs before the Final Award is written for Completeness.</p><p>However, where the determination has been made and the quantum has not been done in apportionment, the Act provides that the successful party is entitled to a reimbursement of 50% of all the Arbitrator's fees, the Administrative costs or the Institutional charges. To that end, these are recoverable from the other party from a Taxation of a Bill of Costs by the Registrar of the High Court of Uganda. The reasoning of the Court is that one cannot have a right without a remedy. <br/><br/>For any clarifications and further questions, our Commercial Arbitration Practice Team at Signum Advocates is ready to advise on any Arbitration matters. ReachOutToUs.</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month.
The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.
Comments