<p>olodo (ɔ̀.lɔ̀.dɔ̀.) noun • Yoruba (a past life)</p><p>A dullard. A slow learner. A person considered unintelligent or incapable of understanding simple ideas.</p><p>A boy who has read the same paragraph four times and still couldn't tell you what it was trying to say. A girl who watched the rest of her class move on without her because she couldn't make the passing grade. The child who has answered every question asked with the wrong answer.</p><p></p><p>olodo (ɔ̀.lɔ̀.dɔ̀.) noun • Yoruba (2026)</p><p>Definition under review. </p><p>A fool who wins? </p><p>A loud idiot? </p><p>An expert in nothing? </p><p>Depends on who you ask. </p><p></p><p>Apparently we've reached that stage of the internet where everyone is passionately arguing about ignorance while very few people can agree on what ignorance actually is. I open my phone, and someone is insisting we're rewarding olodos. Someone else is insisting we're finally celebrating authenticity. But somewhere in the middle of all that shouting, we've also started confusing attention with authority.</p><p></p><p>ignorance (ĭg′nər-əns) noun</p><p>The absence of knowledge.</p><p>Ideally, temporarily.</p><p></p><p>But am I ignorant because I never went to university?</p><p>Or because I had the opportunity to learn and chose not to?</p><p>Am I ignorant because life gave me fewer chances?</p><p>Or because I stopped looking for them?</p><p>Am I ignorant because I don't know?</p><p>Or because I have convinced myself there's nothing left to know?</p><p><br/></p><p>There are people who don't know.</p><p>And there are people who don't want to know.</p><p>Some people don't know because they haven't had the opportunity to learn yet. But they ask questions. They listen. They change their minds. They understand that someone else might know better.</p><p>Others don't know, but don't particularly care. They speak before they think. They defend what they haven't bothered to understand. They influence people without considering where they're leading them. They defend misinformation as fiercely as though it were knowledge, and treat curiosity as a weakness.</p><p>Those are not the same thing.</p><p>I understand the frustration, I really do. </p><p>It's difficult to watch people who seem less informed than you become wealthier, more successful or more influential than you.</p><p>It's tempting to call that ignorance.</p><p>Sometimes we are.</p><p>But sometimes we're simply watching a different kind of intelligence at work, like the ability to entertain, communicate and understand people. Those are skills too, even if they aren't taught in a classroom.</p><p>The entrepreneur who never finished secondary school may understand markets better than the graduate who graduated at the top of their class. The mechanic who cannot write a dissertation may diagnose an engine in minutes. The content creator who understands people can build an audience that marketing professors spend years trying to explain.</p><p>The tragedy isn't that people learn differently.</p><p>The tragedy is that we've begun to admire people who have stopped learning altogether.</p><p>We've become so obsessed with proving that school isn't everything that we're beginning to act as though learning is nothing.</p><p>We no longer reach for understanding first. We reach for convenience. We skim headlines instead of articles. We recycle opinions instead of forming some of our own. We let algorithms think for us, virality think for us, other people think for us. Somewhere along the way, not knowing stopped being embarrassing, and wanting to know did.</p><p>So are we rewarding ignorance or authenticity?</p><p>If by ignorance you mean the girl who watched her class move on without her, but who still asks questions, still listens, who learns, who changes her mind and builds an honest life out of whatever she was handed, then no. We are not rewarding ignorance.</p><p>But if by ignorance you mean the boy with eleven million followers who doesn't know, and has no interest in finding out, who refuses to question themselves while encouraging thousands of others not to either...</p><p>Then yes.</p><p>We are.</p><p>The internet can reward attention all it likes. That's what it was built to do.</p><p>The rest of us, however, should be far more careful about what we reward with influence.</p>
At the end of the month, we give out prizes in 3 categories: Best Content, Top Engagers and
Most Engaged Content.
Best Content
Top Engagers
Most Engaged Content
Best Content
We give out cash prizes to between 7 and 20 community members with the best insights in the past month.
The winners are picked by an in-house selection process.
The winners are NOT picked from the leaderboards/rankings, we choose winners based on the quality, originality
and insightfulness of their content.
Here are a few other things to know for the Best Content track
1
Quality over Quantity — You stand a higher chance of winning by publishing a few really good insights across the entire month,
rather than a lot of low-quality, spammy posts.
2
Share original, authentic, and engaging content that clearly reflects your voice, thoughts, and opinions.
3
Avoid using AI to generate content—use it instead to correct grammar, improve flow, enhance structure, and boost clarity.
4
Explore audio content—high-quality audio insights can significantly boost your chances of standing out.
5
Use eye-catching cover images—if your content doesn't attract attention, it's less likely to be read or engaged with.
6
Share your content in your social circles to build engagement around it.
Top Engagers
For the Top Engagers Track, we award the top 3 people who engage the most with other user's content via
comments.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Engagers" tab on the rankings page.
Most Engaged Content
The Most Engaged Content recognizes users whose content received the most engagement during the month.
We pick the top 3.
The winners are picked using the "Top Monthly Contributors" tab on the rankings page.
Contributor Rankings
The Rankings/Leaderboard shows the Top 20 contributors and engagers on TwoCents a monthly and all-time basis
— as well as the most active colleges (users attending/that attended those colleges)
The all-time contributors ranking is based on the Contributor Score, which is a measure of all the engagement and exposure a contributor's content receives.
The monthly contributors ranking tracks performance of a user's insights for the current month. The monthly and all-time scores are calcuated DIFFERENTLY.
This page also shows the top engagers on an all-time & monthly basis.
Below is a list of badges on TwoCents and their designations.