True
Score | 194
In Africa • 5 min read •
The Man Who Was β€œSleeping” at the UN Was Actually Protesting
<p>When I first saw the photograph, I laughed.</p><p>I saw a Nigerian man sitting at the United Nations with his eyes closed, and my first thought was simple:</p><p><br/></p><p>How is this man sleeping inside a serious United Nations meeting?</p><p>Then I started asking questions.</p><p>Who was this man?</p><p>Why was he there?</p><p>What was happening before that photograph was taken?</p><p>Why have we remembered the closed eyes more than the man who was wearing the suit?</p><p><br/></p><p>His name was Jaja Anucha Ndubuisi Wachuku.</p><p>Born on 1 January 1918 in what is now Abia State, Wachuku became one of the important figures in Nigeria's early political and diplomatic history.</p><p><br/></p><p>He studied law at Trinity College Dublin and was called to the Irish Bar in 1944. He returned to Nigeria in 1947 and became involved in the nationalist movement.</p><p><br/></p><p>In 1949, he founded the New Africa Party. In 1959, he became the first indigenous Speaker of Nigeria's House of Representatives.</p><p><br/></p><p>When Nigeria became independent in 1960, Wachuku became the country's first Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the United Nations.</p><p><br/></p><p>Think about that for a moment.</p><p>Nigeria had just emerged from colonial rule.</p><p>A country that had spent decades under British colonial administration had finally become independent.</p><p>And one of the Nigerians carrying that new country's voice into the international system was Jaja Wachuku.</p><p><br/></p><p>So when I look at that photograph today, I don't just see a man sitting with his eyes closed.</p><p>I see a newly independent Africa sitting at the table of the world.</p><p><br/></p><p>Then I ask:</p><p>What happened?</p><p>Historical accounts tell us that during a United Nations debate, a racial remark was made that offended Wachuku. He demanded an apology and a retraction.</p><p><br/></p><p>According to historian Patrick Geoghegan's 2025 Trinity College Dublin memorial discourse on Wachuku, the apology did not come.</p><p>Wachuku then deliberately pretended to fall asleep as a form of silent protest.</p><p>Now the photograph makes sense to me.</p><p><br/></p><p>He was not simply sleeping.</p><p>He was making a statement.</p><p>This is where I think we need to have an uncomfortable conversation about how African history is remembered.</p><p>Who tells the story matters.</p><p><br/></p><p>If all I show you is the photograph, you may see a lazy African delegate sleeping at the United Nations.</p><p><br/></p><p>But if I give you the history, you see something else.</p><p>You see a Nigerian lawyer who had already built a remarkable career before independence.</p><p>You see the first indigenous Speaker of Nigeria's federal parliament.</p><p>You see Nigeria's first ambassador to the United Nations.</p><p>You see a diplomat who later chaired the United Nations Conciliation Commission for the Congo.</p><p>You see a representative of a newly independent African country operating in an international system that had once been dominated by colonial powers.</p><p><br/></p><p>Suddenly, those closed eyes mean something different.</p><p>But there is another question I cannot ignore.</p><p>What were the other Africans doing?</p><p>Wachuku was not Africa's only representative at the United Nations.</p><p>There were already African representatives from countries such as Ghana, Ethiopia, Liberia, Sudan, Morocco and Tunisia, alongside the newly independent African states entering the organisation.</p><p>Did they support him?</p><p>Did they challenge the remark?</p><p>Did they disagree with his method?</p><p>Did they remain silent?</p><p><br/></p><p>I have not found enough evidence to tell you what every African delegate did in that particular moment.</p><p>And I will not invent an answer.</p><p><br/></p><p>But the question matters.</p><p>Because what does Pan-African solidarity actually mean when one African is insulted?</p><p>African governments did not always agree with one another. Wachuku himself had disagreements with other African leaders over questions of representation and strategy.</p><p>That is part of African history too.</p><p><br/></p><p>This is why I have become increasingly interested in African history.</p><p>I do not want Africans to inherit every interpretation of Africa simply because it was written first.</p><p><br/></p><p>I want us to ask questions.</p><p>I want us to return to the archives.</p><p>I want us to read the documents.</p><p>I want us to listen to oral histories.</p><p>And, most importantly, I want Africans to tell African stories with African historical consciousness.</p><p><br/></p><p>This does not mean that I believe every European account of Africa is false.</p><p>European records can contain valuable historical evidence. African scholars have also built on European archives, and Africans and Europeans have collaborated in the production of knowledge.</p><p>The problem begins when a European interpretation automatically becomes the final interpretation of an African experience.</p><p>That is where I disagree.</p><p>Africa must not always appear in history as the object being studied.</p><p><br/></p><p>Sometimes, Africa must be the subject doing the studying.</p><p>Jaja Wachuku's Pan-African outlook did not begin at the United Nations.</p><p>He founded the New Africa Party in 1949, a movement connected to Pan-Africanism and Nigerian independence. Later, as Nigeria's first Foreign Minister, his foreign-policy thinking placed strong emphasis on African unity, Afrocentrism and Africa's interests.</p><p>So perhaps the sleeping photograph tells us something larger than what happened inside one UN meeting.</p><p><br/></p><p>Perhaps it reminds us that African dignity cannot depend on how the world chooses to photograph us.</p><p>People can misunderstand us.</p><p>They can reduce our history.</p><p>They can laugh at an image.</p><p>They can tell the story from another angle.</p><p>But we cannot afford to remain silent about our own past.</p><p>Because if we do not tell our stories, someone else will tell them for us.</p><p><br/></p><p>And when someone else's interpretation is repeated long enough, it can become the version of history we inherit.</p><p>I am writing because I want young Africans to understand that our history is filled with people who stood in places we sometimes imagine Africans were never meant to occupy.</p><p><br/></p><p>People like Wachuku.</p><p>People who studied.</p><p>People who represented Africa.</p><p>People who challenged power.</p><p>People who walked into international institutions and refused to behave as though Africa had arrived there by permission.</p><p>And that is the part of this story I find most important.</p><p>The photograph shows a man closing his eyes.</p><p><br/></p><p>History shows me a man who knew why he was there.</p><p>So the next time you see that photograph, don't laugh too quickly.</p><p>Look again.</p><p>Ask questions.</p><p>Find the history behind the image.</p><p><br/></p><p>Because the greatest injustice we do to our history is not forgetting it.</p><p>It is remembering it wrongly.</p><p><br/></p><p>As Africans, we must learn to do more than preserve our history.</p><p>We must reclaim the authority to interpret it.</p><p><br/></p><p><br/></p><p>Sources: Patrick Geoghegan, Jaja Wachuku (1918–1996), Trinity College Dublin Memorial Discourse, 2025; United Nations Digital Library records on Wachuku and Nigeria.</p>

|
Support me with a small tip. It helps me keep creating stories that inform, inspire, and make an impact.

Other insights from 𝑫'𝒙π‘ͺ𝑬𝑳𝑳𝑬𝑡𝑻 β„’ ✍️πŸ₯‡

Contributor Points

Points-to-Coupons

Referral Earning


Insights for you.
What is TwoCents? ×